{"id":"W2003862055","doi":"10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.052","title":"Aquatic hazard assessment of a commercial sample of naphthenic acids","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemosphere","topic":"Petroleum Processing and Analysis","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Research Council; University of Alberta","keywords":"Naphthenic acid; Hazard analysis; Hazard; Environmental science; Aquatic toxicology; Sample (material); Waste management; Environmental chemistry; Chemistry; Engineering; Chromatography; Toxicity; Reliability engineering; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001758191,0.0001277704,0.0003902932,0.00001021011,0.00004297238,0.00001188026,0.0002582936,0.00009308584,0.001299925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001632262,0.0001163452,0.0001722422,0.000150634,0.00009641928,0.0000387157,0.00004914465,0.000128323,0.000004910373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003263588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000816547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001259428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003082888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990469,0.00001722835,0.000334524,0.0001812572,0.0002545998,0.0001655229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990993,0.0001469688,0.0002444785,0.0003917104,0.00006152935,0.00005606399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004669715,0.000594617,0.2930522,0.001770912,0.0004135021,0.000001204472,0.0004178912,0.0001474754,0.4815157,0.000450606,0.0008643639,0.2207249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002887421,0.0001259984,0.009790279,0.0006764424,0.0006244185,0.00000505418,0.0008836659,0.04652897,0.9125141,0.002363825,0.0229123,0.0006875614],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9375215,0.0001147674,0.00441229,0.00009377277,0.00002043001,0.000004933903,0.00001485364,0.00003249217,0.05778497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916263,0.000007629033,0.006687156,0.00003390407,0.0000660126,0.000003362086,0.00002517511,0.00001599128,0.001534515],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4309983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01212741022005094,"score_gpt":0.2709853237712929,"score_spread":0.2588579135512419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}