{"id":"W2003867177","doi":"10.1016/j.cam.2014.11.050","title":"Detecting complete and joint mixability","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics","topic":"Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Variance (accounting); Convergence (economics); Joint (building); Joint probability distribution; Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Rate of convergence; Distribution (mathematics); Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004563228,0.001020418,0.001515914,0.002655726,0.0007728029,0.002980646,0.001587213,0.00184123,0.002118098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03380883,0.001206538,0.001047653,0.001457435,0.001940814,0.005462175,0.005954449,0.001908845,0.0005211751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000607841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009996826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007325627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008783855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952258,0.000991018,0.0003414629,0.001299287,0.001471549,0.00067096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755442,0.01400852,0.003792602,0.003403923,0.001898314,0.001352544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006254856,0.001032146,0.3506911,0.0004624215,0.001413803,0.001759574,0.00143348,0.1356897,0.1123762,0.09117871,0.002369821,0.2953381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000983307,0.00054906,0.04185973,0.00004015808,0.0001906499,0.0008982339,0.0004622288,0.76115,0.04360943,0.1491584,0.001867311,0.0001165268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6317733,0.0001777335,0.3643742,0.0002701875,0.0000305113,0.00009016041,0.0004824589,0.0005016434,0.00229983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753535,0.00006208491,0.0230332,0.0000405185,0.00003369388,0.00004647853,0.0004264951,0.00005927869,0.0009447289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004563228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02413297,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1172609859854556,"score_gpt":0.3680766123870925,"score_spread":0.250815626401637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}