{"id":"W2003867442","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2001.tb00291.x","title":"Cattle and Wildlife Competition for Forage: Budget Versus Bioeconomic Analyses of Public Range Improvements in British Columbia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Forage; Forestry; Geography; Welfare economics; Population; Agricultural science; Economics; Agricultural economics; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Sociology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000449412,0.000278687,0.0004275634,0.0009567432,0.0007334733,0.001493913,0.0008389054,0.000514139,0.005620114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001844226,0.0002904819,0.0003364976,0.001531788,0.0006753603,0.0005766603,0.0004990724,0.0004553118,0.0002265156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02141502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005871906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9274427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9651241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996796,0.00006251778,0.000009205504,0.00003045868,0.00005085467,0.0001674521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990904,0.0003558984,0.0001236496,0.00005161941,0.000219961,0.0001585003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001067089,0.0005208313,0.5510251,0.0002687222,0.0004296348,0.0008132596,0.000969903,0.3874265,0.006129321,0.008943281,0.003499114,0.03890728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008277791,0.0002100541,0.8285896,0.00007073816,0.0001736547,0.00007665019,0.003139739,0.1609819,0.0007060752,0.001928009,0.003979699,0.00006117063],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955775,0.0001427172,0.0001810863,0.000120512,0.000001143284,0.00001273819,0.000426238,0.000005502745,0.003532591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956233,0.0001688194,0.0002610156,0.00002470366,0.000001336993,0.00001904661,0.0003385893,0.000005229039,0.003558025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07255727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1553776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09929061534584217,"score_gpt":0.2044589111834409,"score_spread":0.1051682958375987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}