{"id":"W2003913317","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.05.010","title":"Enhancing public trust in the food safety regulatory system","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Policy","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Food safety; Transparency (behavior); Legislation; Business; Agency (philosophy); Public relations; Public health; Government (linguistics); Public trust; Food safety risk analysis; Marketing; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0767284,0.0003870949,0.000685556,0.002221583,0.00589525,0.01611141,0.00181104,0.01660114,0.01122452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2074833,0.0007220027,0.0007393108,0.001215877,0.01011031,0.01238716,0.01183493,0.01179762,0.0009043731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01836493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04281127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0182876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01466944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9232205,0.05143767,0.002136958,0.003084139,0.008583999,0.01153688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.638932,0.2501096,0.03736268,0.01677954,0.02948903,0.02732709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008922109,0.001567107,0.05683719,0.0005206513,0.0003394518,0.001443395,0.02066058,0.01065674,0.002716023,0.7414739,0.05908576,0.1038071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007113963,0.0007953642,0.04810914,0.00116043,0.0003622161,0.0005024903,0.01684113,0.02404241,0.004873302,0.7185473,0.1836816,0.0003732464],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.204405,0.001383517,0.02139831,0.6022216,0.001057441,0.0002294415,0.0000925632,0.000174281,0.1690378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844151,0.0001857696,0.0007598873,0.01181746,0.0002994051,0.00003840017,0.00001088075,0.00001660741,0.002456628],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0767284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4057834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05291805033540843,"score_gpt":0.2894717631614211,"score_spread":0.2365537128260127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}