{"id":"W2004094403","doi":"10.1002/app.12194","title":"Synthesis and characterization of amphiphilic hydroxypropylcellulose‐graft‐poly(ε‐caprolactone)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Polymer Science","topic":"biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Differential scanning calorimetry; Caprolactone; Copolymer; Polymer chemistry; Materials science; Amphiphile; Polymerization; Gravimetric analysis; Chemical engineering; Chemistry; Polymer; Composite material; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002221803,0.0003101832,0.0001710366,0.0004316391,0.0001440277,0.0002585533,0.0001072546,0.0002064945,0.0008503809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003378493,0.0001116516,0.0001617628,0.0002068687,0.0001438678,0.0002656456,0.0001038708,0.000238023,0.0004778844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001780989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027515,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004228339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004313479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998672,0.00001233823,0.0000118974,0.00002372122,0.00006161306,0.0000231938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997322,0.00004473791,0.00007595846,0.00002487192,0.00005768484,0.00006459559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001573766,0.00001297316,0.0000609894,0.00001687898,0.000001101307,0.00003681828,0.000005402246,0.00005833318,0.9981294,0.00002519746,0.0000087883,0.00162843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005059683,0.00007909003,0.001001988,0.000002535183,0.00000460505,0.00007681263,0.000003893096,0.0002813883,0.9976412,0.00001926933,0.0008818835,0.00000221448],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753054,0.002189857,0.01935776,0.00009018766,0.00003662337,0.0001291739,0.0005791499,0.0001412124,0.002170679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787326,0.001208409,0.01429977,0.00005881275,0.00002587987,0.00007592225,0.0008846476,0.00005480833,0.004658987],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0008503809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00284481,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01327486635779468,"score_gpt":0.2059613665664043,"score_spread":0.1926865002086096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}