{"id":"W2004169255","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.12154","title":"Phylogenetic conservatism in plant phenology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":245,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"McGill University; University of California, Santa Barbara; Vanderbilt University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Phenology; Biology; Abiotic component; Phylogenetic tree; Ecology; Phylogenetics; Climate change; Phylogenetic comparative methods; Evolutionary biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001176928,0.00004859934,0.0001361349,0.00003671721,0.00001868415,0.000005989104,0.0001322431,0.00006416797,0.1442426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004948188,0.00003995041,0.00002752843,0.00007866831,0.0001128624,0.00006132642,0.00005100769,0.0001072231,0.001493374],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000207252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009388316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001071966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009956212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994147,0.00004709617,0.0002405048,0.00006141149,0.00006545045,0.0001707844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996836,0.00005888828,0.0001391558,0.00005497118,0.00001037356,0.00005306707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001116225,0.00010484,0.9517988,0.000001579338,0.000006650215,0.00005457874,0.00009727808,0.0000235169,0.01298337,0.0004158367,0.03357617,0.0009262084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003993623,0.0001243252,0.9887893,0.000001581246,0.000002849378,0.0001806714,0.0003033977,0.00003087348,0.0001815551,0.0009517741,0.008992726,0.0000415807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907054,0.00004399475,0.000006216024,0.002353691,0.0002317769,0.0000549036,0.000003430263,0.000002160542,0.006598397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987667,0.00007771717,0.00008615077,0.0009454162,0.00001910292,0.000004156488,0.000001650061,0.00000266907,0.00009650079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1427492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02286385700923575,"score_gpt":0.2284682993033604,"score_spread":0.2056044422941247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}