{"id":"W2004201211","doi":"10.1007/s12014-009-9025-4","title":"Quality Assessment of Tandem Mass Spectra by Using a Weighted K-Means","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Proteomics","topic":"Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Tandem; Mass spectrum; Quality (philosophy); Spectral line; Cluster analysis; Computer science; Cluster (spacecraft); Tandem mass spectrometry; Data mining; Pattern recognition (psychology); Artificial intelligence; Mass spectrometry; Chemistry; Physics; Materials science; Chromatography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003308079,0.0009196356,0.001246164,0.004191091,0.0009790027,0.001923284,0.001649168,0.001154219,0.001163152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0102404,0.0004117439,0.001504582,0.002653233,0.0007632312,0.001337242,0.001012845,0.0006859318,0.00051967],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001113598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001321538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01054342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006588224,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972716,0.0005705144,0.0003620177,0.0006675366,0.0009555576,0.0001727908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946844,0.001277799,0.0006913088,0.000420042,0.002778923,0.0001476059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001274489,0.0003378516,0.0310507,0.0005686479,0.0007667495,0.0001809953,0.000563766,0.1983643,0.0280975,0.003525561,0.004134369,0.7311351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004034739,0.0001135887,0.006025476,0.00002892041,0.00009613283,0.0001048868,0.000123325,0.9802703,0.009478622,0.00270152,0.0009564318,0.0000604849],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07237191,0.000353782,0.9250373,0.000143846,0.00005699412,0.0001239575,0.0002078882,0.001218359,0.0004860707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3566889,0.0001676629,0.6414101,0.00003777479,0.00004213683,0.000147099,0.0006535932,0.0001372644,0.0007154886],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01054342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02096415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07681754032576754,"score_gpt":0.4376204948272208,"score_spread":0.3608029545014533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}