{"id":"W2004393548","doi":"10.1007/s10822-008-9250-3","title":"Interaction force diagrams: new insight into ligand-receptor binding","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design","topic":"Estrogen and related hormone effects","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Force field (fiction); Ligand (biochemistry); Chemistry; Crystallography; Representation (politics); Interaction energy; Chemical physics; Receptor; Binding site; Biophysics; Geometry; Physics; Mathematics; Molecule; Biology; Quantum mechanics; Biochemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002822611,0.0002590264,0.0003238527,0.0001995386,0.0001282177,0.0000515365,0.0003115329,0.0002591845,0.000006597147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007314725,0.000223518,0.000337414,0.0001945352,0.00005705963,0.00002745499,0.00008955905,0.0003607249,0.0000366495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005504562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002758902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005515734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.272282e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984338,0.0002282574,0.0005188732,0.0002535626,0.0002927579,0.0002727564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998812,0.00004856848,0.0004273755,0.0002450957,0.0001849204,0.0002819975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002839213,0.0001005971,0.00006757974,0.00001114386,0.0003017534,0.0002720365,0.0002575782,0.006502909,0.9738018,0.00002061056,0.01015828,0.008221789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001439156,0.002223498,0.00003648871,0.0001121269,0.00006487143,0.001549245,0.00001335016,0.0009901752,0.9808474,0.00008729513,0.01235545,0.0002809016],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.512347,0.00172272,0.4850349,0.0001072828,0.000572405,0.0001312156,3.639949e-7,0.0000102227,0.00007393124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9424782,0.0009396365,0.0549858,0.0003116148,0.000958026,0.00000313588,0.00002108136,0.00005291422,0.0002495587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4301313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01321343356921166,"score_gpt":0.2416139044659268,"score_spread":0.2284004708967151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}