{"id":"W2004441857","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.005","title":"Source References and the Scientist's Mind-Map: Harvard vs. Vancouver Style","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Reading (process); Order (exchange); Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Space (punctuation); Ideal (ethics); Search engine indexing; Mind map; Process (computing); Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Linguistics; Literature; Philosophy; Art","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002360734,0.0001078176,0.0001918265,0.00008887785,0.0002086014,0.007681562,0.0006461574,0.0002060716,0.00008744065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003732633,0.00006108003,0.00009194894,0.0001225557,0.0004079977,0.0007687075,0.0002455001,0.0006506288,0.00001021895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001259841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105354,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007763178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004948274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986513,0.0001521771,0.0003500626,0.0001788407,0.0004471887,0.0002203947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985665,0.00009589107,0.0003494078,0.0001901028,0.0006413389,0.0001567326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002361365,0.0000663687,0.01837761,0.00002749729,0.0002070411,0.000007669741,0.000807238,0.000006387512,0.01921793,0.0001643152,0.6815073,0.2793745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00166277,0.000254447,0.01121868,0.00006139863,0.00003316861,0.00006909398,0.0019114,0.0000417986,0.001583059,0.0007111232,0.9823205,0.0001325391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816963,0.002834306,0.002379389,0.01008699,0.001097102,0.00009989928,0.0000033649,0.000007196687,0.00179547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890141,0.0001342841,0.006044136,0.001154836,0.0005964122,0.000003787032,0.000003094043,0.000009389909,0.003040001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3008132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01310722891378824,"score_gpt":0.2322029804361854,"score_spread":0.2190957515223972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}