{"id":"W2004442383","doi":"10.1002/smll.201001097","title":"From Ideas to Innovation: Nanochemistry as a Case Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Small","topic":"History and advancements in chemistry","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Invention for Innovation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Nanochemistry; Perspective (graphical); Soul; Entrepreneurship; Engineering ethics; Materials science; Nanotechnology; Graduate students; Management; Medical education; Political science; Engineering; Medicine; Theology; Computer science; Philosophy; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009723969,0.0001946634,0.0001568278,0.00002746582,0.0001559658,0.00003543957,0.000299172,0.0001408858,0.006727033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002440335,0.0002140007,0.00003579687,0.0002191872,0.000043953,0.00005180421,0.0001221261,0.0004558845,0.0002213181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005638335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008808579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002382038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009230634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988282,0.000004755441,0.0003084914,0.0004563759,0.000176502,0.0002256241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988714,0.00005037909,0.00009111656,0.0007380172,0.0001132017,0.0001359207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003620342,0.000311618,0.001683658,0.00003204472,0.00003680377,0.002399807,0.001228246,0.000002178442,0.9907419,0.00004364136,0.0009129351,0.002570959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007016356,0.00002510062,0.000008556105,0.00002301886,0.00002614429,0.0004726024,0.004313949,0.000002487495,0.869258,0.0005837471,0.1242513,0.0003334382],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9487979,0.00001601477,0.00002217997,0.00006214161,0.000337984,0.00007127596,0.00003991577,0.0001127669,0.05053975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767708,2.539137e-7,0.001648449,0.000263502,0.0008753983,0.00006272544,0.00004537797,0.00002704792,0.02030646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1233384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02053142129252962,"score_gpt":0.2939286591435381,"score_spread":0.2733972378510085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}