{"id":"W2004475891","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2011.04.014","title":"Coronary Artery Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Jewish General Hospital","funders":"Jewish General Hospital","keywords":"Medicine; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Pericardiocentesis; Meta-analysis; Confidence interval; Incidence (geometry); Percutaneous; Internal medicine; Perforation; Credible interval; Cardiology; Surgery; Odds ratio; Cardiac tamponade; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007432751,0.0004230646,0.009195998,0.001015545,0.0001081511,0.0000279729,0.0002240738,0.0003014992,0.0009765937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003663718,0.000300645,0.006894805,0.0003332308,0.0001436379,0.00009250196,0.00003366505,0.0005880693,0.00002970486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003110785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000783357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009009233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006204063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965197,0.0007499996,0.002002135,0.0002922502,0.0001385155,0.0002974183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970784,0.0002011243,0.001145483,0.0005153163,0.0004332533,0.0006264573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001382675,0.00001098225,0.00008550519,0.6774624,0.3072329,0.009309716,0.00003781374,0.000003948143,2.15859e-8,0.00004074551,0.000867022,0.004935124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001247681,0.0004145541,0.0001345602,0.03596355,0.7512661,0.1608676,0.00003553759,5.205977e-7,6.390331e-9,0.000009661474,0.0510036,0.0001795502],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002896854,0.9977468,0.000156839,0.0001080123,0.0002055872,0.001155152,0.0001703603,0.000006375209,0.0004218613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006759024,0.9917092,0.00006399677,0.0001319358,0.0001704261,0.00006738333,0.0001274779,0.00003800994,0.0009325761],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6414989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07698479480829962,"score_gpt":0.3172752932901529,"score_spread":0.2402904984818533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}