{"id":"W2004475891","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2011.04.014","title":"Coronary Artery Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Jewish General Hospital","funders":"Jewish General Hospital","keywords":"Medicine; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Pericardiocentesis; Meta-analysis; Confidence interval; Incidence (geometry); Percutaneous; Internal medicine; Perforation; Credible interval; Cardiology; Surgery; Odds ratio; Cardiac tamponade; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01339715,0.002611547,0.0164287,0.004425165,0.0007371239,0.002414285,0.002037332,0.002915859,0.004109266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04175555,0.002205895,0.03255928,0.004977856,0.0007767743,0.001917443,0.002090797,0.002314112,0.0003149345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002164866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003178351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005791544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02355186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9885601,0.004978753,0.003717375,0.001139032,0.001231892,0.0003729474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9685102,0.02158517,0.006568036,0.001070013,0.001925173,0.0003413348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003292898,0.00004349362,0.005170776,0.2611483,0.7172446,0.0002146137,0.0001258887,0.0002729469,0.0001814231,0.00006770403,0.0005480506,0.01168934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008074496,0.000212916,0.003134578,0.01125869,0.9833001,0.0001513752,0.0000539247,0.00008459575,0.00005552435,0.00008430654,0.0008331576,0.00002338749],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.008508776,0.9898691,0.0005609155,0.0001335983,0.0001845696,0.0002372177,0.0003044124,0.00001742375,0.0001840609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2524005,0.7416916,0.003062893,0.0009650844,0.0003399247,0.0006716263,0.0005042967,0.00002969272,0.0003344537],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0164287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07085168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07698479480829962,"score_gpt":0.3172752932901529,"score_spread":0.2402904984818533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}