{"id":"W2004698653","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2012.704171","title":"An interdisciplinary analysis of microteaching evaluation forms: how peer feedback forms shape what constitutes “good teaching”","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Teacher Education and Leadership Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Microteaching; Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Presentation (obstetrics); Teaching method; Peer feedback; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Psychology; Sample (material); Peer assessment; Perception; Session (web analytics); Pedagogy; Computer science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06217209,0.0003779345,0.0005796885,0.003041109,0.003170542,0.005444501,0.00106295,0.0006179408,0.002224104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1861856,0.0003419062,0.0004028547,0.002346013,0.005376815,0.003436587,0.003792911,0.001256792,0.0002938826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00427346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004398684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001475575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003757714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9155794,0.06825482,0.002926384,0.002222463,0.00971084,0.001306102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6964174,0.2435611,0.01500324,0.01112107,0.03161954,0.002277602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004524188,0.0002999422,0.06807748,0.0007286981,0.00004016912,0.0003029447,0.666059,0.0004908366,0.006267122,0.008737779,0.001720846,0.2468227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004930795,0.001036612,0.1886569,0.0009983012,0.00007055928,0.0006236905,0.7525237,0.003620288,0.01073567,0.01128622,0.03023501,0.0001637998],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9579265,0.0002324612,0.02336694,0.001115147,0.00005916845,0.0008347412,0.0000833697,0.00007568381,0.01630597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987763,0.0001058943,0.009070149,0.000150209,0.00001731216,0.0005614336,0.00003813136,0.00005857494,0.002235333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06217209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3288014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3791535234857442,"score_gpt":0.5708644718789562,"score_spread":0.191710948393212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}