{"id":"W2004701503","doi":"10.1037/1076-8998.14.1.1","title":"Occupational risk perception, safety training, and injury prevention: Testing a model in the Italian printing industry.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Occupational safety and health; Risk perception; Perception; Occupational injury; Human factors and ergonomics; Psychological intervention; Injury prevention; Structural equation modeling; Psychology; Risk assessment; Personal protective equipment; Applied psychology; Poison control; Work (physics); Environmental health; Medicine; Nursing; Engineering; Computer security; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01290906,0.002005618,0.0008809122,0.001524267,0.001052162,0.001982002,0.002472665,0.001662914,0.007157439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02673418,0.0008158759,0.003572965,0.001061516,0.001924995,0.001714843,0.002323027,0.002318102,0.001000036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002656361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00322631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0373497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01566344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938203,0.004632915,0.000122731,0.0005233536,0.0004725812,0.0004281416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9537421,0.04112794,0.001901653,0.00110766,0.0009757923,0.0011448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003750747,0.0149983,0.9077641,0.0004923784,0.001379036,0.0009005265,0.009276864,0.01026158,0.0008139662,0.005374314,0.001702761,0.04328547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001317527,0.00955997,0.7691891,0.0004740635,0.001716648,0.0006005158,0.007624766,0.2005209,0.0005667718,0.006073842,0.002222876,0.0001330675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945499,0.0002324177,0.002391108,0.0004571793,0.00004598416,0.0002076838,0.00009321188,0.00001981715,0.002002658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945381,0.0002734289,0.003684337,0.0001524952,0.00003533973,0.0003863148,0.0002280092,0.00000907442,0.0006928465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0373497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07426459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3003255015110482,"score_gpt":0.5864726562795789,"score_spread":0.2861471547685307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}