{"id":"W2004847582","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2006.00389.x","title":"The forward premium anomaly: statistical artefact or economic puzzle? New evidence from robust tests","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Economics; Inference; Anomaly (physics); Statistical inference; Regression; Econometric model; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08360762,0.001065702,0.00292757,0.004729579,0.0008659591,0.00496095,0.005675562,0.003611196,0.01160285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4825493,0.0006630417,0.002201384,0.005591749,0.009519508,0.007651914,0.00382428,0.004892142,0.001588093],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009291955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001446399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003304394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00164271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9570652,0.02142249,0.003343658,0.005963205,0.01091383,0.001291678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1918363,0.659545,0.05921007,0.07289372,0.01465921,0.001855659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003247436,0.0008598297,0.2458734,0.001799944,0.006689337,0.003400955,0.002065833,0.03711595,0.003036257,0.4033812,0.01958769,0.2729423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009542688,0.0007421021,0.1233954,0.0006057603,0.002567678,0.001458547,0.0009341718,0.151376,0.00713129,0.6929804,0.0175164,0.0003380663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5048789,0.01116113,0.4194139,0.02239474,0.001335019,0.0002338536,0.003066725,0.002124571,0.03539119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798321,0.001106778,0.01535852,0.001157691,0.000796144,0.00003795963,0.0006401459,0.0002140809,0.00085656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4421647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1325714687319304,"score_gpt":0.1972054219831491,"score_spread":0.06463395325121868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}