{"id":"W2004847582","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2006.00389.x","title":"The forward premium anomaly: statistical artefact or economic puzzle? New evidence from robust tests","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Economics; Inference; Anomaly (physics); Statistical inference; Regression; Econometric model; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001708305,0.0004830608,0.001116732,0.0004893061,0.0005068192,0.0006934324,0.001261404,0.000306996,0.002006051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008589439,0.0004897836,0.0003443942,0.0001316268,0.0002882563,0.0008808302,0.00005585521,0.0005735245,0.0001467738],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003846038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003137503,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6181225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955275,0.00007034872,0.002403693,0.0007638801,0.000004205632,0.001230394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940159,0.001343088,0.001689364,0.0009232518,0.0001034433,0.001925007],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000329252,0.00002249702,0.3304569,0.0000286444,0.0002887393,0.0001369513,0.0002730142,0.008215942,0.000002277785,0.6438116,0.01405709,0.002377043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001104194,0.0003608336,0.09281923,0.0001207196,0.00005964464,0.0002012208,0.000121932,0.06468382,0.00001370927,0.73937,0.1002066,0.0009381056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.983586,0.001727588,0.001787538,0.00414322,0.002690779,0.0003983219,0.0021131,0.0000124274,0.003541041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926182,0.0003989587,0.002271032,0.0002144049,0.001664955,0.00001671927,0.00004654042,0.00008885855,0.002680301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3766761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1325714687319304,"score_gpt":0.1972054219831491,"score_spread":0.06463395325121868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}