{"id":"W2004848130","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.01.002","title":"Reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls and the case for a new working stress design method","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Reinforcement; Stiffness; Structural engineering; Mechanically stabilized earth; Stress (linguistics); Geotechnical engineering; Geosynthetics; Engineering; Limit state design; Retaining wall; Geotextile","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003624954,0.0001538058,0.0002054725,0.00006959366,0.00007472429,0.00006513418,0.00006553411,0.00008349392,0.00001296077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005490522,0.0001144116,0.00003599457,0.0001089581,0.00003573622,0.00006651545,0.00002801862,0.0001048911,0.000001439614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001809454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007444616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001640359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000174225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999271,0.00002637106,0.0002271057,0.0001614978,0.00006176604,0.000252293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993335,0.0004206473,0.00002057432,0.0001412932,0.00001218933,0.00007176994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002157898,0.000003784004,5.624997e-7,0.00008669824,0.00001054754,0.000007914703,0.0005295533,0.8626335,0.00004124501,0.0007941737,0.00002187462,0.1358486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001079857,0.00001971069,0.0000346837,0.00006975833,0.00002274202,0.0001112123,0.0001378501,0.9917263,0.00004925011,0.0006359906,0.005961981,0.0001505984],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2725982,0.01170766,0.7092843,0.002664578,0.0003352596,0.002284722,0.00001418919,0.0005693968,0.0005416395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981394,0.0006371559,0.0008408613,0.00003232346,0.00008868294,0.00006470954,0.000003409832,0.00002166558,0.0001717449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7255412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.466557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01339949254900024,"score_gpt":0.2232782178241696,"score_spread":0.2098787252751693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}