{"id":"W2004933235","doi":"10.1139/f10-021","title":"Do in-stream restoration structures enhance salmonid abundance? A meta-analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Faculty of Arts and Sciences; Concordia University","keywords":"Riffle; Stream restoration; Environmental science; Habitat; Rainbow trout; Large woody debris; Biomass (ecology); Abundance (ecology); Debris; Trout; Coarse woody debris; Restoration ecology; Ecology; Electrofishing; Hydrology (agriculture); Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Geography; Riparian zone; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0193383,0.002843148,0.00697217,0.003563593,0.00068796,0.002277818,0.002757604,0.002072386,0.00406388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0257567,0.001596541,0.0259049,0.003663052,0.0007742057,0.001182989,0.001153057,0.001830801,0.0003932708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001153926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001339101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01005934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01267527,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9854116,0.0107884,0.0008999821,0.002106129,0.0004253826,0.0003686129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658412,0.02889946,0.001632182,0.002234651,0.0006851265,0.000707334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005923414,0.0001674344,0.05380008,0.008769818,0.9137642,0.0002543058,0.0001223078,0.005169061,0.0008865864,0.0002109037,0.0006647062,0.01026709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001165864,0.001352807,0.03207619,0.0007508585,0.955568,0.0001316221,0.0001391401,0.006643863,0.0005570836,0.0006126249,0.0009436027,0.00005839881],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6361987,0.3304264,0.02296295,0.002058222,0.0009640439,0.0004124739,0.004790018,0.0006833514,0.001503851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814309,0.01120472,0.005783416,0.0002345963,0.0001038083,0.0001952959,0.0007077695,0.0000578105,0.0002817025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1022719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02299297061294859,"score_gpt":0.2460275358694982,"score_spread":0.2230345652565496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}