{"id":"W2004933235","doi":"10.1139/f10-021","title":"Do in-stream restoration structures enhance salmonid abundance? A meta-analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Faculty of Arts and Sciences; Concordia University","keywords":"Riffle; Stream restoration; Environmental science; Habitat; Rainbow trout; Large woody debris; Biomass (ecology); Abundance (ecology); Debris; Trout; Coarse woody debris; Restoration ecology; Ecology; Electrofishing; Hydrology (agriculture); Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Geography; Riparian zone; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006973207,0.00008927292,0.0002892827,0.0001850124,0.0003913246,0.0001317964,0.0002445007,0.00003769634,0.002168395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001789873,0.00006319469,0.0000944708,0.0006138259,0.001045862,0.0004491895,0.00002405497,0.0001342291,0.000004269063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002676199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007411371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007683584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.734742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991649,0.00003922742,0.0002474675,0.0001658052,0.0001734497,0.0002091915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995044,0.00007699645,0.0001778671,0.00009035226,0.000008065254,0.0001422534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004266161,0.000009204395,0.9871711,0.000003286862,0.001256849,0.00003320769,0.001585742,0.0002923464,0.00007270592,0.0007729536,0.006943601,0.001854796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009170821,0.0001600578,0.9726901,0.000002064717,0.00323312,0.00001463456,0.001201149,0.000241636,0.00007234995,0.01357248,0.008562417,0.0001582929],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879869,0.0002534054,0.00007549402,0.005173734,0.0001946177,0.00006115776,0.000002013047,0.000001704236,0.006250935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973731,0.00003366018,0.001889218,0.000398371,0.00001833229,0.000003124002,2.645172e-7,0.000001846215,0.0002820769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7270585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02299297061294859,"score_gpt":0.2460275358694982,"score_spread":0.2230345652565496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}