{"id":"W2005006676","doi":"10.1007/s10845-014-0926-3","title":"Remaining useful life prediction using prognostic methodology based on logical analysis of data and Kaplan–Meier estimation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Prognostics; Reliability engineering; Reliability (semiconductor); Thresholding; Data mining; Hazard; Proportional hazards model; Estimation; Computer science; Engineering; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001627984,0.0001246292,0.0003870144,0.0004849332,0.00003923271,0.00002912585,0.0001646823,0.00009616703,0.00002828192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00123106,0.000101545,0.00008025521,0.0001728619,0.00003779382,0.0002673987,0.000036604,0.0002170066,5.176423e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006414857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001731132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003859041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002631061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986824,0.0001563525,0.0006495368,0.0001557805,0.0002155193,0.0001404347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985929,0.0007071242,0.0002849375,0.0002505447,0.00008048055,0.00008408706],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006040067,0.0000236439,0.002787924,0.00007739424,0.0002163876,0.000001630822,0.0001196682,0.9890342,0.0004513058,0.0000232675,0.00001231868,0.007191889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001449438,0.00011022,0.009476724,0.0001441384,0.0005654307,0.00001127963,0.000058218,0.9789061,0.01027799,0.0001430672,0.00008219498,0.000079725],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3982216,0.00003199499,0.601481,0.00002776419,0.0001231531,0.00005408294,0.00000532776,0.00001471638,0.00004036228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8916971,0.00006835765,0.1081141,0.00003172155,0.00005442029,6.303736e-7,0.00002097016,0.00001130839,0.00000139222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4934755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4140887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09751947791469256,"score_gpt":0.3055849809544451,"score_spread":0.2080655030397525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}