{"id":"W2005053191","doi":"10.1111/1467-6486.00236","title":"Institutional Ownership, Strategic Choices and Corporate Efficiency: Evidence from Japan","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Studies","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Business; Stewardship theory; Industrial organization; Mediation; Productivity; Institutional theory; Capital intensity; Affect (linguistics); Stewardship (theology); Economics; Human capital; Market economy; Corporate governance; Finance; Principal–agent problem; Economic growth; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001904166,0.0003200879,0.00044298,0.001367454,0.0007685078,0.001023609,0.0003403265,0.0003843456,0.001618357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005196497,0.0003686705,0.0004088581,0.002407798,0.001631568,0.0009978039,0.001452834,0.0003263611,0.0001471343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006950874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007679298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02818948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04371389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999371,0.0002012203,0.00008957917,0.0001119592,0.0001239723,0.0001022612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897386,0.003040432,0.004871851,0.0005685175,0.001170722,0.0006097989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009554379,0.0001367684,0.9887506,0.0001098536,0.000142527,0.0002776798,0.002831185,0.0001350601,0.0003055349,0.0003537046,0.0001338023,0.006727733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001804846,0.00007433998,0.9951776,0.00003537366,0.0001632445,0.0001199468,0.003348459,0.0001640812,0.0001777588,0.0001397299,0.0005702223,0.00001110095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986938,0.0005465249,0.00006348306,0.00005546366,9.906853e-7,0.000003296916,0.00003495522,5.835186e-7,0.0006010393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991117,0.0006209958,0.00005702873,0.00002257913,0.000003700298,0.000003016652,0.0000835544,5.926826e-7,0.00009687305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02818948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05605078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1165450974490326,"score_gpt":0.2727437046053399,"score_spread":0.1561986071563073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}