{"id":"W2005053191","doi":"10.1111/1467-6486.00236","title":"Institutional Ownership, Strategic Choices and Corporate Efficiency: Evidence from Japan","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Studies","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Business; Stewardship theory; Industrial organization; Mediation; Productivity; Institutional theory; Capital intensity; Affect (linguistics); Stewardship (theology); Economics; Human capital; Market economy; Corporate governance; Finance; Principal–agent problem; Economic growth; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005137781,0.0001836663,0.0003054775,0.0001979374,0.0002543374,0.0001848992,0.0002675085,0.00002747389,0.00003893595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000769352,0.0001361058,0.00006950879,0.0004481002,0.0001642112,0.001718687,0.0001844492,0.0001332979,0.00004995639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000451651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001909008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001031109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001209772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987068,0.00001057826,0.0004274653,0.0002114619,0.0004400973,0.0002036634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983032,0.00006887874,0.00121917,0.0001291096,0.0002653659,0.00001428138],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005476284,0.0002815928,0.9246378,0.0006108739,0.0008679375,0.001018289,0.0002709065,0.002514186,0.000158031,0.0423026,0.01087319,0.01591698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001484279,0.00007994342,0.9213727,0.001412571,0.000401581,0.00001947026,0.002175595,0.0006166415,0.000009848824,0.02583095,0.04622213,0.0003743246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862067,0.006875581,0.0003257399,0.00205683,0.0006188574,0.0001207573,0.000001707567,0.00002058383,0.003773267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989144,0.008340075,0.0002219215,0.000748063,0.0009277667,0.000004361869,0.000001203032,0.00000836465,0.0006042749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03534893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5550231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1165450974490326,"score_gpt":0.2727437046053399,"score_spread":0.1561986071563073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}