{"id":"W2005060717","doi":"10.1007/s11632-005-0047-3","title":"Institution, legislation and policy analysis of China’s wetland protection","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forestry Studies in China","topic":"Wetland Management and Conservation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Wetland; China; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Business; Environmental planning; Wetland conservation; Institution; Central government; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Public administration; Political science; Local government; Economics; Law; Ecology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000838519,0.00007297643,0.0001412871,0.0003479263,0.00004291892,0.000007188525,0.00003128118,0.0000311638,0.000002478733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000338627,0.00006660583,0.00002499462,0.0005974237,0.0000415129,0.0001736737,0.00002268174,0.00005423692,6.442117e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005440705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002662132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001836807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996042,0.00000849062,0.0001590099,0.00008113167,0.00006526468,0.00008193574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998602,0.000005793886,0.00003200986,0.00007777487,0.00001370961,0.00001047942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003617357,0.00004974761,0.4038202,0.0003152152,0.00144191,0.000001796906,0.005511218,0.5342704,0.0003185686,0.009696087,0.0008483662,0.04369034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002182907,0.00001479846,0.930116,0.00002191524,0.00009476278,4.240588e-7,0.00007541625,0.06690631,0.00008703737,0.0007471226,0.0016492,0.00006872849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926291,0.0004132818,0.001972144,0.0004438052,0.00007455298,0.0001425653,0.000002803047,0.0000514734,0.004270321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991199,0.0005268432,0.0001265567,0.000007473787,0.00009630142,0.00002319736,0.00001089396,0.000004054797,0.00008480099],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5262958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2716107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02022079825061804,"score_gpt":0.2663755655603139,"score_spread":0.2461547673096959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}