{"id":"W2005133700","doi":"10.4319/lom.2006.4.448","title":"Evaluation of effective shore level as a method of characterizing intertidal wave exposure regimes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Limnology and Oceanography Methods","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Aeronautics and Space Administration; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Intertidal zone; Buoy; Tide gauge; Shore; Submarine pipeline; Wave height; Significant wave height; Transect; Environmental science; Splash; Sea level; Latitude; Oceanography; Geology; Meteorology; Wind wave; Geodesy; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00318682,0.0001472869,0.0003763934,0.0002742375,0.00005205285,0.000006301282,0.00009842978,0.0002026485,0.0002258516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001543025,0.0001143961,0.0001112499,0.0002640529,0.0002328605,0.00009416491,0.00002890891,0.0001557484,0.000001099855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001080304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003214763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00138947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000398597,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970971,0.001948634,0.0003227212,0.0002688966,0.0001601975,0.0002024745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986488,0.0008023691,0.0002154438,0.0001452316,0.0001519092,0.0000362534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013659,0.00002072433,0.2499089,0.00003037842,0.0001005303,0.000002345376,0.0002154326,0.000009749173,0.004475615,0.000434019,0.00001235991,0.7446533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005094914,0.0009166177,0.9441297,0.00002757525,0.0002215099,0.0001140268,0.0002932345,0.001931857,0.03550759,0.0154249,0.0007752167,0.00014827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9782862,0.001853327,0.008777965,0.0001072407,0.0002084759,0.0002621927,0.00007126239,0.00001764493,0.01041567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.935972,0.00006761179,0.0636136,0.00006833387,0.00005040867,0.000003325671,0.000105199,0.000002727288,0.0001167395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7445051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4664938,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04049453826148447,"score_gpt":0.3126030999839009,"score_spread":0.2721085617224164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}