{"id":"W2005133700","doi":"10.4319/lom.2006.4.448","title":"Evaluation of effective shore level as a method of characterizing intertidal wave exposure regimes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Limnology and Oceanography Methods","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Aeronautics and Space Administration; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Intertidal zone; Buoy; Tide gauge; Shore; Submarine pipeline; Wave height; Significant wave height; Transect; Environmental science; Splash; Sea level; Latitude; Oceanography; Geology; Meteorology; Wind wave; Geodesy; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001648925,0.0004840492,0.0004285999,0.002541878,0.0003569647,0.0008409354,0.0005557736,0.000264849,0.001308191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003973743,0.0003008988,0.0003969379,0.002385905,0.0003790325,0.0008425949,0.0007265748,0.0004232355,0.0002924053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003401053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002512816,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003647456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009758634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998835,0.0003359815,0.0001246834,0.000185386,0.0004517285,0.00006719572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971331,0.0009730638,0.0006019245,0.0003716902,0.000789331,0.0001308879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004485822,0.0002074952,0.7300849,0.0003763579,0.000360901,0.0002218774,0.001046915,0.01377913,0.08159211,0.00119825,0.0009419618,0.1697415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002323765,0.0004740464,0.8936135,0.00002618057,0.00006749633,0.0002557671,0.0005708128,0.06844291,0.03353655,0.0006436912,0.002273468,0.00007237875],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.8397952,0.0003076516,0.1541549,0.00003832258,0.00002374043,0.0001969494,0.001688965,0.0004786713,0.003315624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9187996,0.0001714456,0.07887696,0.00001793643,0.000009879371,0.0002203875,0.001007622,0.000113353,0.000782866],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003647456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008720398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04049453826148447,"score_gpt":0.3126030999839009,"score_spread":0.2721085617224164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}