{"id":"W2005160800","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.11.005","title":"Indicators for demonstrating sustainable forest management in British Columbia, Canada: An international review","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainable forest management; Certified wood; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Stakeholder; Unit (ring theory); Certification; Business; Legislation; Sustainable management; Performance indicator; Environmental planning; Geography; Sustainability; Political science; Forestry; Ecology; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004880461,0.0001119221,0.0001892484,0.00008085391,0.000212515,0.0001382237,0.0005352634,0.00007677707,0.005287231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006954141,0.0001516445,0.00005180533,0.0006019906,0.0001402362,0.0002571612,0.0002547632,0.0001249807,0.00004014603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007456611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004751908,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6937675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9743444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982888,0.00004938111,0.0003979442,0.0004002339,0.0003078632,0.000555833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995045,0.0000491253,0.0001577875,0.0001653501,0.00000510073,0.0001181024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001703674,0.000160426,0.8994807,0.00006768016,0.000009447081,0.0001229046,0.000004735874,0.0001844146,1.992282e-7,0.001823728,0.0914152,0.006728877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002620016,0.00004980888,0.821663,0.00003156256,0.00001377534,0.000002648477,0.00005328446,0.0001488971,4.263286e-7,0.0009597152,0.1766493,0.0001655109],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9304777,0.00007430152,0.00001348686,0.0004061785,0.00009887655,0.001091594,0.00001308202,0.00003813124,0.06778669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987289,0.0001442592,0.0006817851,0.001369158,0.00006237004,0.0003536851,0.000108732,0.00001287043,0.009978116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.280577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006154242785309988,"score_gpt":0.2274922390219661,"score_spread":0.2213379962366561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}