{"id":"W2005333158","doi":"10.1007/s40273-013-0048-3","title":"Lopinavir/Ritonavir Versus Darunavir Plus Ritonavir for HIV Infection: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for the United States","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PharmacoEconomics","topic":"HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Darunavir; Lopinavir; Emtricitabine; Medicine; Ritonavir; Regimen; Lopinavir/ritonavir; Cost effectiveness; Clinical trial; Viral load; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Intensive care medicine; Internal medicine; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Immunology; Antiretroviral therapy; Risk analysis (engineering)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004144206,0.0003612336,0.0006001487,0.0003396933,0.0003782293,0.0001128674,0.0001652325,0.00009729399,0.0002776212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005085007,0.0002800364,0.0004680528,0.0004959916,0.0001036667,0.0002454045,0.00006248547,0.0001797567,0.0001866735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007824395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002010417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005352341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007019162,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984028,0.00006596126,0.0004393614,0.00049445,0.0001140063,0.0004834167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972224,0.001761086,0.0001742434,0.0003502712,0.0002768003,0.0002152508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03720695,0.0041096,0.3379635,0.002451498,0.1051177,0.00005108831,0.005484933,0.1547662,0.002267364,0.005021802,0.1397383,0.205821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0280439,0.000304726,0.01956046,0.00004578415,0.007099338,0.00001043025,0.0003083197,0.2406385,0.006703539,0.0003714833,0.6962985,0.0006149462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9462016,0.0004255708,0.02841793,0.01217527,0.001414122,0.01020662,0.0005409133,0.0002228172,0.0003951828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674586,0.001599396,0.00265277,0.001510438,0.0008020737,0.01469038,0.006225166,0.0001378234,0.004923339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5565603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06119449999214679,"score_gpt":0.3712327756547588,"score_spread":0.3100382756626121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}