{"id":"W2005374667","doi":"10.1108/jrf-09-2014-0132","title":"Computing value-at-risk using genetic algorithm","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Risk Finance","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Value at risk; Computation; Volatility (finance); Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Population; Monte Carlo method; Portfolio; Mathematical optimization; Genetic algorithm; Econometrics; Originality; Risk management; Set (abstract data type); Expected shortfall; Actuarial science; Algorithm; Finance; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007608233,0.0001191466,0.0002873873,0.0001494841,0.0003526069,0.00009075058,0.0007737675,0.00005426335,0.00001138732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001894917,0.00006746675,0.0001159347,0.0006571114,0.0001035141,0.0002404098,0.0001348293,0.0003048334,0.00006728031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007768727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001694274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000165605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005960876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968321,0.0007287623,0.000885178,0.0001362304,0.001203843,0.0002139178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956281,0.0008678858,0.002307336,0.0003934826,0.0007026151,0.0001005967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003834586,0.00001362612,0.02332921,1.410741e-7,0.000007835734,0.00001049821,0.00150127,0.7208115,0.000006246627,0.00001274492,0.002840124,0.2514284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006946576,0.0001438695,0.08985018,0.00002775279,0.00009700301,0.0005696772,0.0005029738,0.8726674,0.000218496,0.01567173,0.0194092,0.0001470283],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5861306,0.002538839,0.4105207,0.00005400403,0.000576426,0.00003983457,0.000006511489,0.000004106388,0.0001289547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7572553,0.008286593,0.2336072,0.00006070349,0.0005244532,1.075408e-7,2.355446e-7,0.00001452222,0.000250877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2512814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2751214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07691649418869266,"score_gpt":0.3520234781325255,"score_spread":0.2751069839438329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}