{"id":"W2005374667","doi":"10.1108/jrf-09-2014-0132","title":"Computing value-at-risk using genetic algorithm","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Risk Finance","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Value at risk; Computation; Volatility (finance); Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Population; Monte Carlo method; Portfolio; Mathematical optimization; Genetic algorithm; Econometrics; Originality; Risk management; Set (abstract data type); Expected shortfall; Actuarial science; Algorithm; Finance; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001626174,0.0009078636,0.001247434,0.002023535,0.0005980508,0.00138725,0.0009679953,0.001274914,0.001789416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005887127,0.0004108166,0.0009073647,0.001422868,0.0006845082,0.0009012505,0.0007632112,0.001057397,0.0002586039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001321306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00214535,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009335543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005107488,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990122,0.0003655695,0.00005650434,0.0001848357,0.0002796756,0.0001012492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978611,0.001470484,0.0001636308,0.00008462664,0.0003667564,0.00005339366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003943538,0.00005353175,0.002180767,0.0000481985,0.00007449768,0.00005984818,0.00004117953,0.9385795,0.0008199733,0.004720225,0.0004989461,0.05288387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009502226,0.00002251753,0.0002578898,0.00001087098,0.00001441125,0.00001928206,0.00001172069,0.9956166,0.0003302672,0.003432902,0.0002682167,0.000005814003],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05485065,0.000483123,0.9399313,0.0003445969,0.00006341674,0.0001184069,0.00006653564,0.0004415419,0.003700332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5481405,0.0004138317,0.4492867,0.0001599607,0.00004534201,0.0002203215,0.0001894678,0.00007562246,0.001468188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009335543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01856244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07691649418869266,"score_gpt":0.3520234781325255,"score_spread":0.2751069839438329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}