{"id":"W2005403351","doi":"10.1139/l06-010","title":"Determining a reasonable concession period for private sector provision of public works and service","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Procurement; Private sector; Critical path method; Public sector; Private finance initiative; Business; Key (lock); Service (business); Public–private partnership; Finance; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Economics; Computer science; Marketing; Systems engineering; Computer security; Economic growth; General partnership","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008948702,0.0004590039,0.0006104155,0.001702845,0.002069944,0.003104391,0.001524222,0.002059286,0.005485134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0193032,0.0006043505,0.0006695135,0.0009646661,0.001665111,0.004415319,0.001173799,0.001628791,0.000657284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003395378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006106701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00668506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01135025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967551,0.001585232,0.0001628742,0.0003107493,0.0007202161,0.0004658032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992552,0.004556491,0.00112175,0.0003861679,0.0008758107,0.0005077149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005034704,0.000247814,0.006425722,0.0002865892,0.00005716392,0.0005896121,0.001304318,0.549759,0.006106368,0.3582626,0.003021691,0.0734356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001617868,0.0009729603,0.01118738,0.0005676351,0.00009265746,0.000765393,0.004348087,0.7386679,0.008708055,0.2042406,0.0299955,0.0002920815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.193551,0.0009486464,0.7582347,0.001840967,0.0001174383,0.0009681329,0.0002212063,0.0002809291,0.04383707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.900878,0.0003212363,0.09541609,0.000070151,0.00002179413,0.0004020855,0.00006036964,0.00005306432,0.002777155],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008948702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04732579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02094911842253441,"score_gpt":0.2050899440895561,"score_spread":0.1841408256670217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}