{"id":"W2005462082","doi":"10.1007/s11409-009-9041-9","title":"Epistemic profiles and metacognition: support for the consistency hypothesis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Empirical research; Psychology; Session (web analytics); Context (archaeology); Think aloud protocol; Cognition; Mathematics education; Protocol analysis; Cognitive psychology; Empirical evidence; Rationality; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005726653,0.0001295941,0.000178423,0.00005461285,0.0006144898,0.0000981143,0.00005511814,0.00007254633,0.0007360195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003076642,0.00009155909,0.00006724795,0.0000801259,0.0001459374,0.00009204667,0.00001022237,0.0001876354,0.00003889691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006694239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002187735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000157976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002029026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990766,0.0001738353,0.0002119838,0.000252124,0.00008414302,0.000201317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984893,0.001165495,0.0001095565,0.00008744471,0.00009764885,0.00005054626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004827916,0.0003163439,0.006751851,0.0002090015,0.0007643916,0.00001885711,0.006845987,0.00001371575,0.0023238,0.1564323,0.009180487,0.8166605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002435209,0.001492825,0.7462912,0.00009293138,0.001162649,0.000621947,0.06313281,0.0001639455,0.0005066143,0.06524687,0.1180849,0.0007681565],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8103921,0.01387793,0.003118822,0.02947648,0.0008368426,0.001556063,0.00005599334,0.0003043269,0.1403814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904768,0.000303865,0.001182849,0.001265349,0.0001696715,0.0001637464,0.00004087421,0.0000101654,0.006386679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8158923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8058897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07536978327440856,"score_gpt":0.3312625127068852,"score_spread":0.2558927294324766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}