{"id":"W2005465654","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.2211","title":"Mucinous cystadenoma of a horseshoe kidney: A case report and literature review","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","topic":"Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Horseshoe kidney; Mucinous cystadenoma; Medicine; Cyst; Histopathology; Abdomen; Renal parenchyma; Anatomy; Kidney; Urothelium; Cystadenoma; Pathology; Radiology; Urinary system; Internal medicine; Ovary","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009143441,0.00009760169,0.0003715911,0.00009649725,0.0001193489,0.00001634504,0.00003570225,0.0001829493,0.00004913233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00391211,0.00007128422,0.00008165922,0.0002001937,0.00004878618,0.00006819079,0.00001705577,0.0004394068,0.000004905487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003119659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006779784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001756985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002242022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989669,0.0001367604,0.000352358,0.0001320678,0.0001763971,0.0002355612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979409,0.00006182338,0.000283699,0.00008378354,0.0005142259,0.001115593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007125716,0.00007128301,0.3048272,0.0001157411,0.000216079,0.5303531,0.0005685752,2.897066e-7,0.000008251868,0.00005825592,0.1628326,0.0008773079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000840302,0.001275339,0.04928814,0.0002468312,0.0002744238,0.7972207,0.0001645657,0.00000362834,0.000001726173,0.0003263662,0.1502674,0.00009053926],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7929448,0.0812719,0.000005362781,0.1183365,0.0003359278,0.0003216153,0.00006343112,0.00001744533,0.006703004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823989,0.003080165,0.0002281303,0.01242547,0.0002935632,0.000005651292,0.00001713978,0.000005720627,0.001545294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2668675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4683444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02120077322147895,"score_gpt":0.2709200086159489,"score_spread":0.2497192353944699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}