{"id":"W2005465654","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.2211","title":"Mucinous cystadenoma of a horseshoe kidney: A case report and literature review","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","topic":"Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Horseshoe kidney; Mucinous cystadenoma; Medicine; Cyst; Histopathology; Abdomen; Renal parenchyma; Anatomy; Kidney; Urothelium; Cystadenoma; Pathology; Radiology; Urinary system; Internal medicine; Ovary","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003534428,0.001405824,0.001145477,0.00782069,0.001654578,0.001851948,0.001638427,0.002501738,0.002399957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001290713,0.0006365312,0.0007220267,0.00638462,0.001802672,0.002902097,0.00161573,0.001126379,0.001135647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008221431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001155302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00161991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002786613,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999453,0.00004668758,0.0001884424,0.000115219,0.0001004142,0.00009613752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989195,0.0002674976,0.0004206538,0.00006839867,0.0001106475,0.0002132839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004913085,0.0001069029,0.01288541,0.002719067,0.00009631617,0.9371393,0.0007016382,0.000190406,0.001711234,0.0004819626,0.005598201,0.03832038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008648475,0.0000302724,0.005429482,0.0005419211,0.0001126795,0.9799154,0.0006348854,0.0001106396,0.0003124817,0.0003206134,0.0125566,0.00002631778],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1523936,0.8280632,0.002880578,0.002566159,0.001944487,0.0002109548,0.0003339125,0.0002035694,0.01140358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5042961,0.4826746,0.002452506,0.001962039,0.00578662,0.00007224933,0.0004616864,0.00003530694,0.002258972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00782069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008028626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02120077322147895,"score_gpt":0.2709200086159489,"score_spread":0.2497192353944699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}