{"id":"W2005504642","doi":"10.1017/s0266462312000050","title":"CAN COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS INTEGRATE CONCERNS FOR EQUITY? SYSTEMATIC REVIEW","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Rubric; Equity (law); Normative; Management science; Systematic review; Computer science; Actuarial science; MEDLINE; Psychology; Economics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03120686,0.0004747651,0.009109802,0.004231952,0.000103308,0.00007634667,0.001772298,0.0005588231,0.00009135765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003702482,0.000470563,0.001345895,0.001029723,0.00008571026,0.0003099611,0.0002204707,0.00111845,0.0000415875],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01216723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002259494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000236772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002566544,"domain_scores_codex":[0.984254,0.001197464,0.01310505,0.0005387593,0.0003211352,0.0005835902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751398,0.002113539,0.02102803,0.0006172695,0.0008927252,0.0002086271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006796591,0.0001182694,0.001054008,0.9061218,0.003668362,0.000008273191,0.0001810049,0.00002543605,3.081296e-9,0.06814406,0.000486958,0.02018501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008348397,0.0002456297,0.00007424773,0.5393685,0.002126337,0.0001212164,0.001409654,0.00006128843,6.886469e-8,0.002707336,0.4524948,0.0005561658],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003703525,0.9679082,0.004387296,0.01798722,0.00213374,0.005944101,0.001508291,0.00003046854,0.00009697405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001477784,0.9913783,0.001803269,0.002639576,0.0003295998,0.001859886,0.0004255048,0.00005854583,0.00002754118],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4520078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5284010234743582,"score_gpt":0.6169168294647444,"score_spread":0.08851580599038611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}