{"id":"W2005673966","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.11.004","title":"ICQSWM: An inexact chance-constrained quadratic solid waste management model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Quadratic equation; Mathematical optimization; Quadratic programming; Municipal solid waste; Interval (graph theory); Computer science; Linear programming; Solid waste management; Reliability (semiconductor); Operations research; Scale (ratio); Mathematics; Engineering; Waste management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001273667,0.0007338736,0.001516551,0.0005215451,0.0004889852,0.001540666,0.00206615,0.002611132,0.005844018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002526914,0.0007734008,0.0007261525,0.00101725,0.0008341725,0.001204029,0.001635935,0.001465432,0.0005872885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008177909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002095191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0180162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009823865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994617,0.0001863739,0.00002599321,0.00009044956,0.0001631357,0.00007242495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991295,0.0004671564,0.00008734837,0.00004918747,0.0001997503,0.00006711842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001423859,0.000008315946,0.00004479124,0.00001577827,0.000005750835,0.00001060496,0.000004339216,0.9950044,0.00006331976,0.001866271,0.0002952053,0.002667038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004766659,0.000006264691,0.0000120376,0.000001616706,0.000001598178,0.000001733202,9.275498e-7,0.9991775,0.00003772472,0.0005763799,0.0001779915,0.000001441795],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01712542,0.0002626063,0.9699772,0.0005032018,0.000105856,0.0000782319,0.0003504601,0.0003825373,0.01121445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7848583,0.0003338156,0.1902314,0.0003984885,0.0001009614,0.0004527569,0.0007523383,0.0002148596,0.02265707],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0180162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03582269,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.014791175415581,"score_gpt":0.2236781492066497,"score_spread":0.2088869737910687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}