{"id":"W2005673966","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.11.004","title":"ICQSWM: An inexact chance-constrained quadratic solid waste management model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Quadratic equation; Mathematical optimization; Quadratic programming; Municipal solid waste; Interval (graph theory); Computer science; Linear programming; Solid waste management; Reliability (semiconductor); Operations research; Scale (ratio); Mathematics; Engineering; Waste management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001843452,0.0001902165,0.000180261,0.0002052601,0.0001511518,0.0001640913,0.0001173366,0.00007331439,0.00001208438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000623401,0.0001838454,0.00003617015,0.0001955615,0.00003058933,0.0003111368,0.00002141202,0.0001047199,0.000005387331],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002330857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002711654,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003896857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007440021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999024,0.00002805271,0.0003142848,0.0002305172,0.000158327,0.0002448187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996211,0.00001552648,0.0000610735,0.000185555,0.00002471572,0.00009205553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002729992,0.0000330072,0.0002993402,0.0001264874,0.00004929856,0.000006310801,0.001973809,0.9694443,0.001373146,0.001196123,0.0002055304,0.02526537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004834745,0.00004023574,0.0007749811,0.00008527828,0.00003768981,0.000002047861,0.0004523982,0.995232,0.0003317764,0.0007711763,0.001556796,0.0002321146],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9065711,0.0002032537,0.07964895,0.0004781931,0.00007692371,0.0002989573,0.000001751834,0.0004673759,0.01225342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992636,0.0003214829,0.005341103,0.0005668713,0.00009828254,0.00001072459,0.00004233072,0.0000251181,0.0009580658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08606485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7496997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.014791175415581,"score_gpt":0.2236781492066497,"score_spread":0.2088869737910687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}