{"id":"W2005814799","doi":"10.5539/ibr.v2n4p188","title":"A Study of Hong Kong Tax Compliance Ethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Compliance (psychology); On board; Accounting; Business; Composition (language); Economics; Public economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003890927,0.0001483576,0.0002154521,0.001321879,0.003681149,0.002405369,0.000424446,0.0003972091,0.002791474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01051272,0.0002132315,0.000152553,0.002366643,0.002314747,0.00166422,0.001288066,0.0008980749,0.0001842603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00900342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007570023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1934367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1618803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973586,0.001377144,0.0001671577,0.0001543508,0.0003926016,0.00055014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836537,0.00571263,0.004442391,0.001108647,0.002885245,0.002197408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001114557,0.0004419653,0.7272593,0.00008573499,0.00003832463,0.001544662,0.2182602,0.0004773687,0.0004459532,0.02068304,0.00326821,0.02738372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001714889,0.0002372517,0.7882755,0.00008643007,0.00002071779,0.000311741,0.1867792,0.001563963,0.0003327707,0.001252514,0.02107897,0.0000438989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947279,0.0000536336,0.00008781321,0.0003450097,0.000004220081,0.00002197637,0.00002093227,0.000001340559,0.004737168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976501,0.00008812444,0.00006656938,0.00007918862,0.000004289797,0.00001236879,0.00002306928,0.000001286545,0.002074918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1934367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3846215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3926503637745026,"score_gpt":0.4349775850988453,"score_spread":0.04232722132434269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}