{"id":"W2005892383","doi":"10.1016/j.jsis.2004.10.001","title":"A resource-based view of competitive advantage at the Port of Singapore","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Strategic Information Systems","topic":"Maritime Ports and Logistics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Competitive advantage; Port (circuit theory); Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource; Quality (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Business; Position (finance); Investment (military); Industrial organization; Resource-based view; Environmental economics; Computer science; Marketing; Economics; Engineering; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007652825,0.0003429494,0.0003188751,0.002282177,0.002703421,0.0124057,0.001166911,0.001790648,0.01449326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001508418,0.0001944275,0.0004484733,0.002628553,0.004931986,0.009051123,0.00329645,0.001525947,0.001028395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004787675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00232952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01746689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01834134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992378,0.0002790311,0.00002946707,0.00007593292,0.0001987701,0.0001789918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990655,0.0002749722,0.0001511572,0.00005980781,0.0001957945,0.0002528307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004311062,0.00001945054,0.002408221,0.00003367531,0.00001756017,0.0004359384,0.002058558,0.001676261,0.0002175282,0.9849787,0.001163398,0.006947475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003079867,0.0001276992,0.01367293,0.0001698236,0.00007614504,0.000581711,0.01869145,0.01459177,0.0005207566,0.8583964,0.09306663,0.00007388597],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1588398,0.001274341,0.007266856,0.00928479,0.00007968443,0.00002378109,0.0001457741,0.00002965039,0.8230553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856884,0.0004779019,0.0005423701,0.0001762858,0.00003243859,0.00001044399,0.00003389587,0.00001110967,0.01302709],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01746689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0484848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02153588358059211,"score_gpt":0.2229967679791055,"score_spread":0.2014608843985134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}