{"id":"W2005924051","doi":"10.1007/s10601-005-0552-y","title":"An Efficient Bounds Consistency Algorithm for the Global Cardinality Constraint","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constraints","topic":"Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Local consistency; Cardinality (data modeling); Constraint programming; Consistency (knowledge bases); Constraint (computer-aided design); Benchmark (surveying); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Constraint logic programming; Constraint satisfaction; Algorithm; Mathematics; Stochastic programming; Artificial intelligence; Probabilistic logic; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006771307,0.000220539,0.0002170054,0.00004748986,0.000545729,0.000374652,0.0006765099,0.0001005123,0.0001745872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008850335,0.0001779934,0.0001803451,0.0002914233,0.000987372,0.0002779864,0.00007485763,0.0001341152,0.00004045047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002091452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004471512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001747357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003717497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982297,0.0001025086,0.0003990522,0.0005261975,0.0003140479,0.000428538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984128,0.0002346766,0.0001388784,0.0007097028,0.0002829944,0.0002209005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002722995,0.00006250749,0.0004088037,0.000003232023,0.00003636848,0.000002931895,0.0001550756,0.002787688,0.0000161389,0.1196655,0.000193174,0.8766658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001046479,0.00007746796,0.00684962,0.00001395577,0.00003966563,0.0002868669,0.000387438,0.9787039,0.0001218759,0.001425085,0.01070772,0.0003399594],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001343773,0.0001576663,0.9889217,0.002371466,0.0007856713,0.0006207196,0.0001485246,0.00027225,0.005378244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7936468,0.000007907354,0.2052902,0.0008006219,0.0001559613,0.00004835272,0.0000119471,0.000006670938,0.00003164349],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9759162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7258359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01721744243950913,"score_gpt":0.2827290062673527,"score_spread":0.2655115638278436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}