{"id":"W2005939192","doi":"10.1111/nin.12070","title":"Ways of knowing: realism, non‐realism, nominalism and a typology revisited with a counter perspective for nursing science","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing Inquiry","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nominalism; Reductio ad absurdum; Epistemology; Realism; Typology; Argument (complex analysis); Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Direct and indirect realism; Sociology; Nursing theory; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science; Metaphysics; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; MEDLINE; Archaeology; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009581705,0.0005226142,0.0006297637,0.004267316,0.0054255,0.01045338,0.001337962,0.003929696,0.002903722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01393489,0.0002856739,0.0006977568,0.002446631,0.07528782,0.01458462,0.005868495,0.007791447,0.0003559905],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005637568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002835695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002206669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001860213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9893973,0.007653548,0.0003604902,0.0006581689,0.001609052,0.0003215395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823254,0.01326765,0.001205013,0.001709841,0.001086811,0.0004053545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005189538,0.000002969097,0.00009246496,0.0000206026,0.000001227806,0.00002418637,0.00477747,0.00004480752,0.00002748729,0.9934407,0.0002791029,0.001283867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001222869,0.0000177758,0.0002565469,0.0001337831,0.000004276619,0.0001484318,0.008740114,0.0006532793,0.0001187927,0.9497806,0.04012157,0.00001251827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1044636,0.01133775,0.1399365,0.136701,0.004664581,0.0001869596,0.000116302,0.0001248195,0.6024685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704792,0.001762548,0.01403813,0.00333071,0.0009390507,0.0003078229,0.00004820797,0.00005605849,0.009038242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05067348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08713150088841859,"score_gpt":0.3086858271339191,"score_spread":0.2215543262455005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}