{"id":"W2005996603","doi":"10.1080/09603107.2011.605752","title":"Extreme risk measures for REITs: a comparison among alternative methods","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Financial Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Value at risk; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Real estate investment trust; Extreme value theory; Volatility (finance); Economics; Expected shortfall; Exponential smoothing; Nonparametric statistics; Autoregressive model; Financial economics; Real estate; Actuarial science; Risk management; Statistics; Mathematics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0217407,0.001567845,0.001917714,0.005550607,0.0004953199,0.003077209,0.002175345,0.002069794,0.001703657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06690224,0.0005049849,0.001877415,0.00299563,0.001260698,0.005013171,0.00202554,0.00334837,0.0004828272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001211486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009069083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002016437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001123304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.988865,0.006895365,0.0007685766,0.0008291919,0.00239609,0.0002458334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8954387,0.09133732,0.004743313,0.003799106,0.004059952,0.0006216677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001120261,0.0003018972,0.01823027,0.0009301347,0.0009326946,0.0001980628,0.0005305619,0.5044385,0.001129109,0.09251952,0.003172446,0.3764965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004776257,0.000310646,0.004044766,0.0001899479,0.0000747914,0.0001133,0.0001395314,0.9635755,0.0005625024,0.02904349,0.001816628,0.00008112601],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05796626,0.008969859,0.9286188,0.0004567257,0.0002251819,0.0001550409,0.0002888937,0.0007275251,0.002591692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5563955,0.005234037,0.4342221,0.0002166461,0.0004972543,0.0004019433,0.001051794,0.0004286326,0.001552065],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0217407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1149772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1156668148138413,"score_gpt":0.2654652282011269,"score_spread":0.1497984133872856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}