{"id":"W2006003211","doi":"10.1139/l08-063","title":"Assessment of two a posteriori error estimators for elasticity problems","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Finite element method; A priori and a posteriori; Residual; Norm (philosophy); Elasticity (physics); Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Polygon mesh; Error detection and correction; Mathematics; Approximation error; Algorithm; Computer science; Statistics; Engineering; Structural engineering; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01532776,0.001550888,0.001261307,0.001860249,0.0003874303,0.001305359,0.0009361076,0.002769816,0.001086936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04918024,0.000573346,0.0009364028,0.0005692388,0.001134825,0.002079603,0.002515751,0.001587852,0.0003556198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003454922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006726547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005211646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004022857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947154,0.002560118,0.0002958294,0.0004347104,0.001860471,0.0001333731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9605774,0.02882217,0.00348274,0.002359068,0.004375658,0.0003830813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008436909,0.0002909683,0.01373539,0.001251989,0.0004954383,0.0002363692,0.000530704,0.6269597,0.06381645,0.05254705,0.0009081957,0.2383841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002889979,0.0004247867,0.00416374,0.0001347858,0.00007210558,0.0003170931,0.00008651763,0.952168,0.03345317,0.007347794,0.00171076,0.00009233745],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03318016,0.0008455241,0.9646392,0.00009132148,0.00003466807,0.00004663942,0.00002482189,0.0001772273,0.0009603799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.443617,0.001291299,0.5523177,0.0000769874,0.0001192204,0.0002214006,0.0002098116,0.0002920249,0.001854646],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01532776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08106196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0334404912153108,"score_gpt":0.2989489540432805,"score_spread":0.2655084628279697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}