{"id":"W2006100466","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2009.11.004","title":"Comparison of two heights for forward-placed trunk support with standing work","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Ergonomics","topic":"Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Trunk; Pelvis; Torso; Lumbar; Kinematics; Desk; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Work (physics); Lumbar spine; Electromyography; Hip flexion; Anatomy; Displacement (psychology); Medicine; Simulation; Physical therapy; Computer science; Physics; Range of motion; Psychology; Surgery; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001993502,0.0001373953,0.0004253789,0.0000781945,0.00005569858,0.00000818954,0.0000574584,0.00007147176,0.00002819285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001375233,0.0001053395,0.0000937544,0.0001235011,0.00005840942,0.00003214343,0.000006546737,0.00009285363,0.000006367122],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009006264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005951454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002038709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006933354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991134,0.000007699878,0.0003492414,0.0002125116,0.0001111658,0.0002059673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993457,0.0001355064,0.0001476804,0.0002275489,0.00004713525,0.00009644562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.06413036,0.003752372,0.08025689,0.003624103,0.001134027,0.00000371105,0.01381449,0.007208617,0.1688904,0.4141155,0.02145387,0.2216157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06966104,0.02082854,0.6769557,0.001227717,0.001544745,0.00001372469,0.008838783,0.008790289,0.1379059,0.02606434,0.04541757,0.00275159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771356,0.00003352856,0.0146268,0.0002253781,0.00006408079,0.001086535,0.00000503598,0.00004673158,0.006776292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755443,0.000004252773,0.02387636,0.0001437328,0.0001016909,0.00003439542,0.00009228671,0.00001916473,0.0001838529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5966988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.429562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0189346993533942,"score_gpt":0.3183911078984304,"score_spread":0.2994564085450362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}