{"id":"W2006111992","doi":"10.1016/j.finel.2013.10.008","title":"A systematic and quantitative method to determine the optimal assumed stress fields for hybrid stress finite elements","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Finite Elements in Analysis and Design","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Finite element method; Weighting; Stress (linguistics); Stress field; Mode (computer interface); Similarity (geometry); Field (mathematics); Matrix (chemical analysis); Node (physics); Displacement field; Displacement (psychology); Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Structural engineering; Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001837469,0.001231986,0.0009225778,0.001385227,0.0009293141,0.001320143,0.001882142,0.001124354,0.004373628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005328491,0.0009452385,0.0005624142,0.0007574691,0.001347915,0.001289213,0.001490963,0.00203615,0.001183196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007629072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001849378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00143964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003023969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991002,0.0002003324,0.00004784052,0.00008412126,0.0005391021,0.00002839286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982709,0.0007249707,0.0001177256,0.0002169904,0.0006382772,0.0000311815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007090798,0.0002111503,0.001040077,0.0006412931,0.0000672528,0.00009800309,0.0002516132,0.5393871,0.0683478,0.16332,0.0030248,0.2235399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001904501,0.00004048034,0.0001743486,0.00005032832,0.00001302992,0.00006776751,0.00003041191,0.9678777,0.009772276,0.01768487,0.004240301,0.00002943626],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005221587,0.00001444021,0.9986248,0.000009400532,0.000005979879,0.00003393122,0.0000167691,0.0001517548,0.0006207168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03484305,0.0000585931,0.963539,0.00002702392,0.000007786306,0.0002865102,0.00007279807,0.0002376925,0.0009275594],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004373628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01463127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01882277058926071,"score_gpt":0.2786297124664842,"score_spread":0.2598069418772235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}