{"id":"W2006111992","doi":"10.1016/j.finel.2013.10.008","title":"A systematic and quantitative method to determine the optimal assumed stress fields for hybrid stress finite elements","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Finite Elements in Analysis and Design","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Finite element method; Weighting; Stress (linguistics); Stress field; Mode (computer interface); Similarity (geometry); Field (mathematics); Matrix (chemical analysis); Node (physics); Displacement field; Displacement (psychology); Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Structural engineering; Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006429968,0.0002331398,0.0005611412,0.000474434,0.0001184478,0.0002277775,0.000164339,0.00004770821,0.00009183246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001364948,0.0001687884,0.0001156726,0.0006780481,0.00001488933,0.0001433427,0.00005581684,0.0000932778,0.000002539534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003005343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005910914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007995542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002186994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983184,0.0002114529,0.0006964877,0.0003002148,0.0001984743,0.0002750245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982644,0.001151808,0.0001382468,0.0002545478,0.0001038517,0.00008717264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000240673,0.00002917597,0.004234759,0.0006722727,0.002062328,0.000002450986,0.0008608485,0.9855625,0.0001823765,0.00006060947,0.0001265312,0.006182066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003872357,0.0001039967,0.001699163,0.0001844662,0.001106949,3.81806e-7,0.0003383731,0.9949917,0.0008411798,0.0001092289,0.00003488857,0.0002023969],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03619951,0.0003044534,0.9622013,0.00004974593,0.00003181359,0.001069717,0.00007818256,0.00002223819,0.00004306765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7336399,0.00009941665,0.2655024,0.0001096514,0.00002164081,0.000407467,0.0001001726,0.00002035588,0.00009896475],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6974404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6882993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01882277058926071,"score_gpt":0.2786297124664842,"score_spread":0.2598069418772235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}