{"id":"W2006129010","doi":"10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.030","title":"Benchmark case studies in structural design optimization using the force method","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Solids and Structures","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Sequential quadratic programming; Truss; Finite element method; Benchmark (surveying); Displacement (psychology); Compatibility (geochemistry); Mathematical optimization; Quadratic programming; Flexibility method; Computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm; Structural engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001576469,0.001100433,0.0011024,0.001480925,0.0009275414,0.0009911549,0.00145842,0.002727856,0.004760375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005974653,0.000445027,0.0007884935,0.002093049,0.0006594437,0.0007541512,0.0007163682,0.0008934333,0.0003817784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008649353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006680173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007766039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01298401,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991421,0.0004307022,0.00003895758,0.00005401941,0.0002373155,0.00009704632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966253,0.00254838,0.0001170182,0.0002341856,0.0004069689,0.00006824451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002539132,0.0004331281,0.00117244,0.0002458933,0.00003950749,0.0002010585,0.00005418646,0.969687,0.001000118,0.007879431,0.002101885,0.01693138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110193,0.000270951,0.0009851831,0.00002646856,0.00002077252,0.00007864553,0.00008910686,0.9909714,0.001955723,0.003155723,0.002320565,0.00001528379],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.836358,0.002137162,0.1020632,0.0009821129,0.0001723482,0.0003219636,0.001929751,0.00037805,0.05565733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436887,0.0004283713,0.05045455,0.00005433186,0.00003115093,0.0002406022,0.0007030107,0.00008935753,0.00430992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007766039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01592505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02443427043387708,"score_gpt":0.3351222958946723,"score_spread":0.3106880254607952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}