{"id":"W2006129010","doi":"10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.030","title":"Benchmark case studies in structural design optimization using the force method","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Solids and Structures","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Sequential quadratic programming; Truss; Finite element method; Benchmark (surveying); Displacement (psychology); Compatibility (geochemistry); Mathematical optimization; Quadratic programming; Flexibility method; Computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm; Structural engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000214555,0.0001203552,0.000186745,0.0002072268,0.0000703547,0.00008617607,0.0001484778,0.00004317182,0.00003323878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003602332,0.00007736861,0.00006203332,0.000109954,0.00004005246,0.0002719998,0.00002853838,0.0001588882,3.460704e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001075153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001317766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001053669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000238555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991692,0.00005868706,0.0003883584,0.00007671737,0.0002084786,0.00009860151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994341,0.0001079001,0.0001327596,0.00005927188,0.0002347906,0.00003118137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002171707,0.000001139952,0.0002124424,0.000004655904,0.0002105898,0.0001058436,0.001005687,0.9886935,0.0004240556,0.0003336341,0.00003683618,0.008949862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003168145,0.0000173922,0.0003223663,0.00002236363,0.000056699,0.005370768,0.0003509112,0.9907355,0.0007424048,0.001928192,0.00004656587,0.00009006084],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3539555,0.002864807,0.6422092,0.0001806157,0.0006429585,0.00007263432,0.000004247386,0.000009779182,0.00006021685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8208402,0.0003137777,0.1783755,0.00005829482,0.000398537,4.527327e-7,0.000001304983,0.000008335549,0.000003640436],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4668846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3155001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02443427043387708,"score_gpt":0.3351222958946723,"score_spread":0.3106880254607952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}