{"id":"W2006155152","doi":"10.1080/07011784.2015.1019568","title":"Capacity for watershed cumulative effects assessment and management in the South Saskatchewan Watershed, Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Watershed; Watershed management; Cumulative effects; Environmental resource management; Stakeholder; Environmental planning; Sustainability; Land use; Business; Environmental science; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Civil engineering; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001289903,0.0004112958,0.0004053815,0.0001776602,0.0008044887,0.0003395462,0.0006663998,0.0001223294,0.0000523396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000325847,0.0002725347,0.00009772036,0.0001818492,0.0004882881,0.0003580241,0.0001181201,0.0004308739,0.000005970618],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004827319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002104053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9432983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967914,0.0004506896,0.0004705209,0.0004769551,0.000359351,0.001451054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997861,0.00008034463,0.0001470709,0.0003104355,0.00002692373,0.001574278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006038831,0.0000407433,0.1050628,0.0001246434,0.0001510632,0.001010488,0.8854854,0.001791378,0.0002653505,0.000003803711,0.0003198767,0.005684089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002759018,0.0006632032,0.1755071,0.0002313765,0.0002005057,0.0005870856,0.05028262,0.001032296,0.001075328,0.004303334,0.7620567,0.001301444],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995286,0.00008049638,0.00004785428,0.00149977,0.0001669589,0.0008792281,0.00005187607,0.00001298016,0.001974837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965242,0.00003830311,0.001177971,0.001231544,0.0001501078,0.00009958733,0.00003734378,0.00004711961,0.0006938105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8352028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0230126662667552,"score_gpt":0.2353587707215146,"score_spread":0.2123461044547594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}