{"id":"W2006155152","doi":"10.1080/07011784.2015.1019568","title":"Capacity for watershed cumulative effects assessment and management in the South Saskatchewan Watershed, Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Watershed; Watershed management; Cumulative effects; Environmental resource management; Stakeholder; Environmental planning; Sustainability; Land use; Business; Environmental science; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Civil engineering; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006950207,0.0004077118,0.0003302154,0.00285969,0.009647565,0.007406971,0.002118703,0.0007176224,0.006177335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01110081,0.0004322263,0.0004711827,0.003495464,0.002967495,0.002219288,0.003972447,0.001485958,0.0004044578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1132193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3589888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937502,0.0009318228,0.0002199334,0.0003984102,0.003250082,0.001449581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780574,0.002853721,0.0007992288,0.0006420615,0.0136456,0.004001884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001511213,0.0004576982,0.3664651,0.0006781449,0.0002085173,0.0008376471,0.0219731,0.01570611,0.004745013,0.03504524,0.1111939,0.4425383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006564297,0.0001542556,0.6112032,0.001322078,0.0001419818,0.0002035772,0.07865296,0.01860599,0.002834872,0.01659333,0.2698212,0.0004009547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6737021,0.004167003,0.02070248,0.05348878,0.0002267212,0.002768683,0.0052402,0.0009467711,0.2387572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9441676,0.002250513,0.0262783,0.001661609,0.00002045257,0.000520257,0.001569742,0.00008590981,0.02344573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1132193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8214673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0230126662667552,"score_gpt":0.2353587707215146,"score_spread":0.2123461044547594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}