{"id":"W2006280009","doi":"10.1177/1363459305056416","title":"Adjudicating entitlements: the emerging discourses of research ethics boards","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Confidentiality; Stewardship (theology); Experiential learning; Political science; Information ethics; Engineering ethics; Narrative; Research ethics; Public relations; Experiential knowledge; Informed consent; Sociology; Law; Medicine; Epistemology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06861585,0.0001622475,0.0008762173,0.0002264217,0.01437852,0.00001907754,0.0005270162,0.0001524166,0.00007369548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004987023,0.00008215799,0.0001194672,0.0004327227,0.001749186,0.00009502981,0.0005366006,0.004644175,5.577389e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002582652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001879737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001731592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004125304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925215,0.001779638,0.002051948,0.0003154696,0.002548805,0.0007826821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872562,0.009338791,0.001063948,0.0004040471,0.00148911,0.0004478811],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001335604,0.002002467,0.004092367,0.003376513,0.0002790004,0.000003385209,0.6163108,0.00000974546,0.00001714793,0.007973583,0.0100901,0.3545093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004003376,0.01660889,0.02328459,0.00279295,0.00008757706,0.00004360336,0.9335983,0.0002761082,0.000007746559,0.01355007,0.005651152,0.00009559543],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3540945,0.008810802,0.0006368786,0.6334522,0.0006956268,0.002110142,0.00001372933,0.000009875227,0.0001762238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912805,0.004335306,0.0001433021,0.001695799,0.002075584,0.00008311359,0.000005014697,0.00003015173,0.0003512382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.637186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5903422545073487,"score_gpt":0.7211519096813295,"score_spread":0.1308096551739808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}