{"id":"W2006373459","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.08.005","title":"A cohort study found the RAND-12 and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 demonstrated construct validity in high-risk primary care patients","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Chronic Disease Management Strategies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Institute of Health Economics","funders":"","keywords":"Health Utilities Index; Context (archaeology); Construct validity; Medicine; Cohort; Gerontology; Health care; Primary care; Mental health; Psychometrics; Psychology; Family medicine; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry; Health related quality of life; Pathology; Disease","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005989104,0.0005726533,0.00114776,0.001241268,0.001355178,0.002274136,0.0005557943,0.001056263,0.001295316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02706975,0.0004065642,0.002067072,0.001705949,0.0006569123,0.001092948,0.0008494022,0.001747981,0.0002193544],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008684633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001591502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01497888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02201523,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975138,0.0009635184,0.0003177556,0.0004093378,0.0004241457,0.0003714355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989145,0.004811737,0.002278805,0.001302199,0.001856206,0.0006060954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001395513,0.00007298538,0.9977443,0.0000139957,0.0001876073,0.0000280199,0.0001413581,0.00002401611,0.00003488663,0.00008543685,0.0001059883,0.001421922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003869591,0.0002043957,0.9976825,0.00003062643,0.0005109965,0.0001520521,0.0003333396,0.0002979509,0.0001118073,0.0001911317,0.0004331534,0.00001340248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968069,0.0004905041,0.0004039801,0.0002670815,0.00003839933,0.00005478274,0.0005870482,0.000008137075,0.001343244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987631,0.0001321166,0.0003100863,0.0001678033,0.00002179813,0.00002586223,0.0003607972,0.000002852075,0.0002156795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01497888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03167379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2139975667357311,"score_gpt":0.4743657803542202,"score_spread":0.2603682136184891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}