{"id":"W2006495252","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2005.09.010","title":"Evaluation of non–lead-based protective radiological material in spinal surgery","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Spine Journal","topic":"Radiation Dose and Imaging","field":"Medicine","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Vancouver General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Radiological weapon; Medicine; Lead (geology); Lead apron; Radiation protection; Fluoroscopy; Shields; Dosimeter; Radiation exposure; Nuclear medicine; Medical physics; Electromagnetic shielding; Radiology; Dosimetry; Electrical engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003394502,0.00007274361,0.000215052,0.0001618732,0.00004933898,0.00001647405,0.0000519962,0.00003719165,0.0002458128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000294747,0.00004336789,0.00008616046,0.0001666806,0.00005593712,0.00006778951,0.000006294968,0.0002153573,0.000005438622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001375459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000339796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005635903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003530102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998699,0.0002450343,0.0003588017,0.00007604463,0.0004816935,0.0001393899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994873,0.000008875606,0.0001993772,0.00009460819,0.0001824816,0.00002728965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001197509,0.0009906074,0.02961577,0.0001052999,0.0001501904,0.0001519204,0.0002290154,0.01058013,0.7208663,0.00009448829,0.005377684,0.2306411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00157251,0.0002363585,0.9557538,0.000150134,0.00009250081,0.0002532241,0.00003232939,0.01294399,0.02821267,0.0006667546,0.00003262217,0.00005309056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995661,0.0001478022,0.001325107,0.001721261,0.0001981871,0.0003087494,9.671744e-7,0.000006250471,0.0006307224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986734,0.000005804916,0.0002953348,0.0001000209,0.0008840216,0.00001132388,0.000004591795,0.000006478565,0.00001902349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.926138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2691478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04203192179615747,"score_gpt":0.3298755883854939,"score_spread":0.2878436665893365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}