{"id":"W2006495252","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2005.09.010","title":"Evaluation of non–lead-based protective radiological material in spinal surgery","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Spine Journal","topic":"Radiation Dose and Imaging","field":"Medicine","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Vancouver General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Radiological weapon; Medicine; Lead (geology); Lead apron; Radiation protection; Fluoroscopy; Shields; Dosimeter; Radiation exposure; Nuclear medicine; Medical physics; Electromagnetic shielding; Radiology; Dosimetry; Electrical engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008278101,0.0005004537,0.0003440974,0.001262313,0.0003269662,0.0006453971,0.0005657427,0.0006228746,0.003495836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003073303,0.0002391377,0.0003599289,0.0004957188,0.0006059402,0.0005525563,0.0002592915,0.0003120393,0.0004700972],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002545672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000646243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000552795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004206167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994882,0.0002348767,0.00003657682,0.00003666497,0.0001500401,0.00005355469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982184,0.0009425481,0.0002784753,0.000152309,0.0002888603,0.000119528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02976486,0.0009818261,0.1325898,0.002011484,0.0002353216,0.00934069,0.001126233,0.002594347,0.7174681,0.001628879,0.0006334613,0.101625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002543131,0.02811683,0.1546419,0.0004567819,0.001224437,0.02077619,0.002230765,0.006928143,0.7721521,0.001061008,0.01210592,0.00005172797],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846266,0.006007206,0.003915763,0.0001244022,0.00005695168,0.00007049912,0.00005204148,0.00006160136,0.005085029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971839,0.0007855648,0.00137095,0.00005542779,0.00001330016,0.000008964421,0.00004269091,0.00002337378,0.0005157909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003495836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01169473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04203192179615747,"score_gpt":0.3298755883854939,"score_spread":0.2878436665893365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}