{"id":"W2006601554","doi":"10.1080/07408170903394355","title":"Cooperative cover location problems: The planar case","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIE Transactions","topic":"Facility Location and Emergency Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Aggregate (composite); Heuristic; Facility location problem; Point (geometry); Euclidean geometry; Planar; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Computer science; Point location; Mathematics; Engineering; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009174162,0.0009536913,0.0009168774,0.0007670044,0.0006857471,0.00129124,0.001373077,0.001909913,0.002793276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004067083,0.0005087192,0.0008009723,0.001652504,0.001115741,0.001637406,0.001546678,0.0009285233,0.000425259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008759905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006199317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003382593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002525014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990662,0.0003870805,0.00002197044,0.0001668156,0.0001798579,0.0001781665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983784,0.001078345,0.0002430594,0.0001019379,0.000120534,0.00007775897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004713728,0.00005082378,0.0006803175,0.00009380734,0.00003346609,0.0002340274,0.00008897336,0.9334242,0.0004752619,0.03706967,0.002262478,0.02553978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000289351,0.00008253354,0.0003329123,0.00001455698,0.00001878455,0.0002666404,0.0001431498,0.9455013,0.0003293251,0.04899109,0.004275752,0.00001499439],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04791594,0.0009381419,0.9376554,0.00066985,0.00003945333,0.0001124765,0.000240624,0.0001659565,0.01226203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7904779,0.001918529,0.1963038,0.000196376,0.0001600943,0.0003012262,0.0005912723,0.00006879379,0.009982027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003382593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009344459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02741890058608194,"score_gpt":0.2338652181995632,"score_spread":0.2064463176134813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}