{"id":"W2006708426","doi":"10.1139/b04-052","title":"Positive relationships between invasive purple loosestrife (<i>Lythrum salicaria</i>) and plant species diversity and abundance in Minnesota wetlands","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Botany","topic":"Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Typha; Ordination; Plant community; Native plant; Wetland; Ecology; Biology; Vegetation (pathology); Abundance (ecology); Species diversity; Marsh; Introduced species; Abiotic component; Typha angustifolia; Invasive species; Species richness","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003197258,0.0001156823,0.0002169121,0.0001132573,0.0004457548,0.00004870949,0.0001481777,0.00007875764,0.00003597151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001249928,0.000112627,0.00003030028,0.0001896365,0.0001804582,0.0003589931,0.0001514014,0.0002748935,0.000006068884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005129732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001276405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01889653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6529163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991114,0.00005203495,0.0002612339,0.0001568513,0.0001558881,0.0002626341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991187,0.00009664729,0.0001509978,0.00009120969,0.0000144104,0.0005280112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001087755,0.000005318328,0.9973418,0.000004365269,0.00001266269,0.000249819,0.001703527,0.0001523603,0.00009162553,0.0001527101,0.0001592456,0.0001157278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006020978,0.00008859081,0.9961591,0.000103406,0.00002348808,0.0002868286,0.0006123726,0.00002248435,0.0000426406,0.001346653,0.0005824377,0.0001299002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969772,0.0001549857,0.0001159777,0.001650047,0.00007584561,0.0001073801,0.0001887028,0.000002425453,0.000727433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995414,0.00008133743,0.0001818774,0.00005070579,0.00004749407,4.652782e-7,0.000004223905,0.000007211601,0.00008527741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6340198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9876367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01593663336754099,"score_gpt":0.1755039356393147,"score_spread":0.1595673022717737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}