{"id":"W2006724643","doi":"10.1175/mwr3172.1","title":"A Case Study of Downstream Baroclinic Development over the North Pacific Ocean. Part I: Dynamical Impacts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Monthly Weather Review","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences; National Center for Atmospheric Research","keywords":"Baroclinity; Cyclone (programming language); Cyclogenesis; Climatology; Geology; Couplet; Potential vorticity; Trough (economics); Extratropical cyclone; Oceanography; Vorticity; Atmospheric sciences; Meteorology; Vortex; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007536077,0.000211929,0.0003878819,0.00001397288,0.0001405774,0.00001794501,0.0002429658,0.00004260672,0.00109759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003453681,0.0001268578,0.0001185554,0.0002622227,0.0001142411,0.00009595924,0.0001809901,0.0001356827,0.0001228245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001242441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002190136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001747803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00621167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981153,0.0001944829,0.000686972,0.000369405,0.0003470321,0.0002867858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989817,0.0001040227,0.0001806776,0.0006390703,0.00001037618,0.00008418462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002292356,0.004137878,0.9653223,0.0006506923,0.0000851768,0.0004558026,0.002954092,0.00199991,0.0000164502,0.00001785556,0.008379722,0.01595725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003008234,0.0009939721,0.6618887,0.002214082,0.0009459556,0.0005450012,0.002246307,0.003734664,0.00002418932,0.0003229476,0.3224239,0.001651994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926273,0.003450739,0.000005369438,0.0001043363,0.00004269187,0.001189429,0.00001893133,0.00002555503,0.002535636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984893,0.0009736798,0.00007923099,0.0001674589,0.00001854954,0.00005175815,0.00001290135,0.00001604366,0.0001910294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3140442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02609115581440935,"score_gpt":0.2612637168207806,"score_spread":0.2351725610063712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}