{"id":"W2006791053","doi":"10.1126/science.1259433","title":"Heads-up limit hold’em poker is solved","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Games","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":350,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta; Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures; Compute Canada","keywords":"Perfect information; Limit (mathematics); Imperfect; Computation; Computer science; Combinatorial game theory; Mathematical economics; Extensive-form game; Sequential game; Complete information; Game theory; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001483203,0.0001491455,0.0001415881,0.0001880828,0.0002880992,0.0006441589,0.003233911,0.00005069862,0.00004168595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004485914,0.000130459,0.00005336055,0.001726698,0.0007031715,0.001866705,0.0007853617,0.000150335,0.002139965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001186031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006300959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004542013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002464994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972408,0.00003557762,0.0002544239,0.0007266744,0.001091275,0.0006512338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979628,0.00005888958,0.00008547792,0.001045043,0.0004270134,0.0004207366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003165011,0.0003449089,0.008736526,0.00001720857,0.00001805777,0.00009693723,0.08520789,0.001108001,0.05705818,0.1580544,0.08276438,0.6065619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002331006,0.0003990847,0.004281763,0.00005219383,0.000007372615,0.00006153475,0.002575531,0.305985,0.5128967,0.09204505,0.08047167,0.0009910099],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4127188,0.0006402238,0.5463137,0.01235035,0.008126607,0.0004420372,0.000003900439,0.0008059416,0.01859836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97733,0.000008232074,0.01833495,0.002277057,0.0001173604,0.000008684604,1.677282e-7,0.000007449021,0.0019161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6055709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1142824154970506,"score_gpt":0.3346387999782774,"score_spread":0.2203563844812268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}