{"id":"W2006809702","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.028","title":"Cost-effective abundance estimation of rare animals: Testing performance of small-boat surveys for killer whales in British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Humane Society International","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); IUCN Red List; Abundance estimation; Population; Fishery; Ecology; Endangered species; Geography; Rare species; Distance sampling; Transect; Population size; Estimation; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biology; Demography; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002838277,0.0004466669,0.0003112173,0.0005194794,0.0005595781,0.0005979374,0.0008011932,0.0006125707,0.0006386461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01403464,0.0002601148,0.0002240892,0.0007237018,0.0004118707,0.0007620331,0.0004519913,0.0003103693,0.0001586016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002628414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002082466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5988889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.808301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988313,0.0005194383,0.00008258755,0.0001771054,0.000284352,0.0001052067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897904,0.006916426,0.0006986658,0.0004304981,0.001817482,0.0003466886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001228011,0.0003350188,0.9099188,0.0001274967,0.0001655841,0.0001348138,0.0006996747,0.01470015,0.004194755,0.0001145953,0.0007308791,0.06765032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007681109,0.0007853223,0.9338577,0.00002642981,0.000187947,0.000151807,0.001201028,0.06098516,0.002038429,0.0001227167,0.0005341044,0.00003235371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986192,0.0001196277,0.0005918326,0.00008215278,0.000003250206,0.00001856447,0.0001258267,0.00001871697,0.0004209563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964918,0.0001151292,0.002687955,0.00003261852,0.000002985496,0.00001372368,0.0002136605,0.000004397721,0.0004377932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4011111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8069467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0913858292275923,"score_gpt":0.2808599183788412,"score_spread":0.1894740891512489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}