{"id":"W2006809702","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.028","title":"Cost-effective abundance estimation of rare animals: Testing performance of small-boat surveys for killer whales in British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Humane Society International","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); IUCN Red List; Abundance estimation; Population; Fishery; Ecology; Endangered species; Geography; Rare species; Distance sampling; Transect; Population size; Estimation; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biology; Demography; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008602968,0.00007825268,0.0002453847,0.00001038905,0.00007301108,0.00001863636,0.0001168174,0.00007390849,0.00008991405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001342454,0.00009340616,0.0000363328,0.0003048599,0.0001403711,0.0001180372,0.00007005707,0.00005542055,0.000002985334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008590169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007658298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01239726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03544372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990041,0.0001613612,0.0003449292,0.0002338395,0.00009579075,0.0001600352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999121,0.0004904287,0.0002254569,0.00007984384,0.00006128648,0.00002200352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002198841,0.00005689933,0.7626343,0.00003283233,0.00000231658,4.003232e-7,0.00001755928,0.000268749,0.001612992,0.000009308962,0.0000570005,0.2352857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003180052,0.0008620063,0.9830596,0.0001088754,0.000004198413,0.000001684063,0.00001693739,0.01471278,0.0003289022,0.0002475782,0.0002366749,0.0001027221],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972838,0.00009588336,0.0007668815,0.0000505204,0.00001911973,0.001328887,0.00001640434,0.00001900457,0.0004194871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922811,0.00007207377,0.007345412,0.0001055071,0.000007489816,0.0001430841,0.00002119144,0.000003476058,0.00002068232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.235183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0913858292275923,"score_gpt":0.2808599183788412,"score_spread":0.1894740891512489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}