{"id":"W2006813871","doi":"10.1017/s1431927605501855","title":"A Comparison of Atomic Force Microscopy and Field-Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy for Imaging the Plant Cell Wall","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Microscopy and Microanalysis","topic":"Tree Root and Stability Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Atomic force microscopy; Microscopy; Scanning confocal electron microscopy; Electron microscope; Field electron emission; Kelvin probe force microscope; Conductive atomic force microscopy; Scanning ion-conductance microscopy; Photoconductive atomic force microscopy; Nanotechnology; Scanning electron microscope; Electron; Optics; Scanning capacitance microscopy; Physics; Composite material; Nuclear physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002812085,0.0003632835,0.0006754238,0.0001562256,0.000419854,0.000103312,0.0002158073,0.0001121075,0.000009640525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001901681,0.0002922479,0.0001952284,0.0002108603,0.0001470727,0.0001299832,0.0000910602,0.0002450085,0.000001711276],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008015887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002483884,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001040155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006037909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983163,0.00003703107,0.0005821119,0.0004196891,0.0001045162,0.0005403689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991229,0.0002729457,0.0001380099,0.0003168586,0.00005713037,0.00009211049],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001100669,0.00004533117,0.06292523,0.0002686189,0.0001520487,3.50849e-7,0.002717125,0.0001404344,0.9275521,0.00000591283,0.003654828,0.002427979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000734521,0.00007165629,0.001767037,0.00008571799,0.0003861707,0.000006359882,0.0005107208,0.01319875,0.9717185,0.00004410634,0.01115915,0.0003172778],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.959316,0.03317084,0.006446608,0.0004331474,0.00007268209,0.0003364003,0.00007182688,0.000072658,0.00007990131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946074,0.0005881758,0.004280924,0.0001071937,0.00006121587,0.00003024842,0.0000335254,0.00004106858,0.0002502287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06115819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00924339597712376,"score_gpt":0.276372247145335,"score_spread":0.2671288511682112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}