{"id":"W2006813871","doi":"10.1017/s1431927605501855","title":"A Comparison of Atomic Force Microscopy and Field-Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy for Imaging the Plant Cell Wall","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Microscopy and Microanalysis","topic":"Tree Root and Stability Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Atomic force microscopy; Microscopy; Scanning confocal electron microscopy; Electron microscope; Field electron emission; Kelvin probe force microscope; Conductive atomic force microscopy; Scanning ion-conductance microscopy; Photoconductive atomic force microscopy; Nanotechnology; Scanning electron microscope; Electron; Optics; Scanning capacitance microscopy; Physics; Composite material; Nuclear physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001426004,0.000235608,0.0003188052,0.001380688,0.0006324171,0.0007277268,0.0007036599,0.0009258867,0.001836387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002242691,0.0002326788,0.0002376036,0.0005287608,0.0003459748,0.0008958461,0.0003493397,0.0003218269,0.0003114541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005591676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005652463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002512092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009623663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992925,0.0000807336,0.00002468047,0.00005117328,0.0005072672,0.000043704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981554,0.0008098064,0.000113586,0.0001432229,0.0007125135,0.00006538674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000502079,0.00009790975,0.002597626,0.0002755453,0.00004213299,0.0001580059,0.000127741,0.0003292501,0.9555781,0.001284249,0.0007406079,0.03826662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001060137,0.0005404649,0.05237524,0.0000674561,0.0001382321,0.002729916,0.0003170534,0.02274798,0.9072176,0.0007824522,0.01290215,0.00007545624],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8038256,0.01105196,0.162061,0.00144051,0.0006375934,0.0003084741,0.001012389,0.001155924,0.01850655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8401359,0.003851799,0.1446107,0.0004872152,0.0001275596,0.000159991,0.0006260599,0.0002142134,0.009786544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002512092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007541537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00924339597712376,"score_gpt":0.276372247145335,"score_spread":0.2671288511682112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}