{"id":"W2006823212","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2003.12.017","title":"Haloacetic acids in the aquatic environment. Part II: ecological risk assessment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Pollution","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Haloacetic acids; Macrophyte; Environmental chemistry; Risk assessment; Aquatic ecosystem; Environmental science; Dichloroacetic acid; Chemistry; Ecology; Biology; Water treatment; Environmental engineering; Biochemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003943348,0.0008025599,0.0004301661,0.001281429,0.0002053792,0.0009078679,0.000403759,0.0007388041,0.001830052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004636127,0.000244333,0.0006382351,0.0007115887,0.0003116478,0.0004010956,0.0005277009,0.0003024943,0.000510094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006165392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000615527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004331815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005336978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997613,0.00007198894,0.000017063,0.00001702968,0.0001030897,0.00002957871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998017,0.00008373514,0.00004659576,0.000009965568,0.00004140102,0.00001671901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001245667,0.0009808493,0.02910508,0.003919143,0.001146672,0.001398361,0.0002858968,0.09269219,0.08027565,0.01603849,0.02823932,0.7446728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003207002,0.005960274,0.1606959,0.001510331,0.002162165,0.007752712,0.001033812,0.09994213,0.1811242,0.1005913,0.4386173,0.0002893179],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2494451,0.662473,0.03954772,0.004814926,0.0008143564,0.000283977,0.001156579,0.000252044,0.04121228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5724323,0.3859468,0.006832055,0.0009940675,0.001275317,0.0001388192,0.0007852848,0.0000382416,0.03155711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004331815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008613229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008084982745752763,"score_gpt":0.2193562956982965,"score_spread":0.2112713129525438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}