{"id":"W2006823212","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2003.12.017","title":"Haloacetic acids in the aquatic environment. Part II: ecological risk assessment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Pollution","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Haloacetic acids; Macrophyte; Environmental chemistry; Risk assessment; Aquatic ecosystem; Environmental science; Dichloroacetic acid; Chemistry; Ecology; Biology; Water treatment; Environmental engineering; Biochemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009465816,0.0003559794,0.0002414858,0.00005422562,0.0005373749,0.00004496106,0.0005516728,0.0001777994,0.007168454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000497783,0.0002655523,0.0001227979,0.0002103143,0.0006565269,0.0004177004,0.000374605,0.0005559132,0.003118693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002752627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001943478,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001323948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001064255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969072,0.000375265,0.0004788088,0.0006138624,0.0008848472,0.0007400063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989282,0.00005627756,0.0002016417,0.0006427551,8.23471e-8,0.0001710018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000192689,0.01366712,0.5917801,0.000009314526,0.000172185,0.0004210787,0.01001148,0.05316162,0.145313,0.0007732013,0.002347267,0.1821509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00141232,0.0004794342,0.9875041,0.000008167804,0.00004523736,0.00006206648,0.0005361229,0.0003514756,0.0009142309,0.003620817,0.004720743,0.0003453304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918537,0.00007180553,0.0006232159,0.002618393,0.0001690583,0.0006714023,0.0001037521,0.000050767,0.003837947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972778,0.0002329029,0.00102271,0.00100568,0.00008005835,0.00005012801,0.00001214379,0.00003009903,0.0002884583],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3957239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008084982745752763,"score_gpt":0.2193562956982965,"score_spread":0.2112713129525438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}