{"id":"W2006899706","doi":"10.1111/2041-210x.12230","title":"Reproducibility of pyrosequencing data for biodiversity assessment in complex communities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; McGill University; University of Windsor","funders":"Chinese Academy of Sciences; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Operational taxonomic unit; Biology; Biodiversity; UniFrac; Reproducibility; Abundance (ecology); Taxonomic rank; Pyrosequencing; Ecology; Replicate; Zooplankton; Statistics; Genetics; Taxon","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007468318,0.00006819011,0.0001918705,0.00004323613,0.0001754298,0.000002288417,0.0002415625,0.00006609323,0.00005616477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005082111,0.0000725725,0.00001430573,0.00008253063,0.0006846085,0.0001424308,0.001035468,0.0001308085,0.000002941277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003445416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002703931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002744766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004433537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983327,0.0008637334,0.0001836147,0.0004180117,0.00005568648,0.0001462605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986284,0.0005587692,0.00007855997,0.0007150981,0.000003195462,0.0000159523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001789295,0.00007824,0.9944763,0.00001765928,0.000004224184,1.236687e-7,0.0004108958,0.0003518414,0.00286186,0.0000631126,0.0001913478,0.001526472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003521628,0.00008831752,0.9879712,0.000003558557,0.00001002491,6.343507e-7,0.001540009,0.006657104,0.0001770367,0.002843131,0.0002889296,0.00006789221],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838893,0.00002014516,0.01518997,0.000220011,0.00006576685,0.000229202,0.00004933614,0.000006609042,0.0003296681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.714652,0.00002226656,0.2852356,0.00004437014,0.000002572002,0.000004623559,0.00003268536,9.435871e-7,0.000004979441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2700456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4149283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1228303881716628,"score_gpt":0.3707004572348973,"score_spread":0.2478700690632344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}