{"id":"W2006919898","doi":"10.1139/t01-099","title":"Remote sensing based assessment of hazards from glacier lake outbursts: a case study in the Swiss Alps","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Cryospheric studies and observations","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":621,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Glacier; Hazard; Moraine; Hazard analysis; Geology; Physical geography; Natural hazard; Scale (ratio); Rock glacier; Debris flow; Debris; Rockfall; Hydrology (agriculture); Remote sensing; Environmental science; Landslide; Geomorphology; Cartography; Geography; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006181541,0.0008100807,0.0003133609,0.00121722,0.0005394927,0.0007925934,0.000431403,0.001088469,0.0007306179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001031073,0.0001486541,0.0005213154,0.001140304,0.0006157881,0.0003326652,0.0004315303,0.0002811535,0.00008104218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009979849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003686497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04513646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04700894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997777,0.00007578436,0.00001367931,0.00002554023,0.00006803224,0.00003924875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992275,0.0004995927,0.0000846498,0.00003392742,0.00008727975,0.00006695603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001067251,0.001086563,0.1804076,0.0004893788,0.0002384114,0.02325431,0.001401664,0.7269259,0.01864525,0.001622696,0.001504818,0.04335619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001248312,0.0009787219,0.2353169,0.00005393459,0.0001767162,0.001177667,0.002774966,0.750482,0.006734325,0.0008930524,0.001200516,0.00008635555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971235,0.0001277766,0.001570703,0.0001016218,0.000004805992,0.00004165057,0.0001691815,0.00004159936,0.0008192806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980791,0.0001418356,0.001254797,0.000009962676,0.000008532409,0.00001460139,0.0001344684,0.000003925453,0.000352718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04513646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08974743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03877350591998834,"score_gpt":0.2582916927936689,"score_spread":0.2195181868736805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}